Friday, May 23, 2014


Film Photography- The Anticipation

0
Film-Photography-Anticipation
There’s a knock on the door and before I can open it, the driver has shut his truck door and on his way. It’s okay because my doorstep has all of my attention. What else but an Amazon box, (my heart skips a beat) Full of FILM.

The process begins. I rip open the package, unravel the tab and prepare to place my film into it’s cassette. Carefully, I wrap the film around, wind, wind, wind and see that magic word. Start. Close the back, push the shutter and hear the mechanical “shhhhhhh”. Ready for the first shot. What will it be?

I meter. I meter again and one more time. Just making sure. Set my shutter, double check my aperture. Step back. Hands folded, looking for the shot. I walk around my subject. Got it. Check settings again. Step back again. Talking, searching, intentionally engaging my subjects. She laughs, her head falls forward and I click. The shutter curtain opens and closes and the magic has begun. That moment, the light, the environment is exposed onto a negative and no other negative will ever be the same. I move the camera away from my face and look to my subjects for what is next.

“You don’t take a photograph, you make it.” Ansel Adams   Stay tuned for additional posts about our process of film.
Tahnee-Nick-Engagement-27



Best Digital and Film Photography Books

Download Best Digital and Film Photography Books
Download 

 Filename:Best Digital and Film Photography Books
 Format:Archive
 Downloads count:1715


Download 

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOUR OLD POLAROID RUNS OUT OF FILM? MOD IT TO USE FUJIFILM’S INSTEAD

In this screenshot, photographer Alastair Bird conducts a shoot with a Polaroid camera modified to use instant film. Credit: YouTube
In this screenshot, photographer Alastair Bird conducts a shoot with a Polaroid camera modified to use instant film. Credit: Alistair Bird/YouTube
Analog photography is a term that probably makes some of today’s shooters cringe a bit, but the medium is still very much alive, even if most photo-related companies now focus solely on digital. Professional photographer Alastair Bird managed to get his hands on a modified Polaroid camera, so he decided to give it a whirl in one of his photo shoots.
Bird uses a Polaroid 110B that he believes was originally invented in the 1960s, but film has not been readily available for the camera for at least 25 years. As a solution, the camera was modded to use 4 x 5 instant film from Fujifilm. The camera was also fitted with a hot shoe-to-PC adapter, allowing Bird to put his studio lights to use with this little experiment. 
As you can see, the camera works exactly like the one you may have stumbled across if you’ve ever had to clean out the attic of a parent or grandparent. The camera folds out and has to be fully extended for its rangefinder to work, but even then, Bird mentions, it is challenging to get your shot focused and framed the way you want it. Bird also says that one of the main problems with Polaroid is that you sometimes end up with a shot that’s over- or underexposed, so you need to keep a close eye on your metering  
You can check out finished images from Bird’s Polaroid shoot, including ones he wasn’t too thrilled about, at the The Phoblographer
DT

Pet photography captures your mutt's mug on film

Pets are often the trickiest members of the family to capture in a photo. Pet photography is a growing business, and the pros are pulling out more than a toy or treat to capture the best side of animals.

By Sue ManningAssociated Press / May 22, 2014
undefined
It takes more than a squeaky toy and a camera to capture memorable pet portraits.  Professional pet photographers in the increasingly competitive business quiz owners about their dogs' personalities, find the ideal setting, and use favorite toys to bring out the best in the animals they shoot, knowing that portraits will outlive the pets themselves.
"I spend time getting them to trust me so I can reach into their soul," said Rachael Hale McKenna of New Zealand, who just released her 15th book, "The Dogs of New York."
Twenty years ago, most people didn't think to put their pet in a family photo or on the annual Christmas card. Today, both are likely to be built around a beloved animal. And the older a pet gets, the more people think about professional portraits.
McKenna and two other well-known pet photographers live continents apart and all specialize in candid photos of dogs in their favorite places, not in a studio. They spend time with people and pets before the session starts, and they know the importance of immortalizing aging animals.
Jenna Leigh Teti of Jersey City, New Jersey offers a package for very old or terminally ill dogs.
"It's an important shoot for me, a special thing to capture for someone," she said. "And it's happening more frequently."
To catch the quirks that bring photos to life, Teti and Los Angeles-area photographer Lori Fusaro send letters before an appointment. Teti asks clients to pick out a celebrity their dog resembles for clues about their relationship.
A bulldog owner named Tony Soprano, the mafia boss on the HBO series. The owner of a small mixed breed cited Cary Grant, "because he really knew how to charm the ladies with his dance moves."
Teti's methods have created lasting memories for Zarina Mak and her a pair of rescue mutts.
"You know when you look at the photo that these dogs are family members and not just discarded dogs," said Ms. Mak, who had the pooches photographed twice and plans more as they age.
Photo sessions usually take an hour or so, the photographers said, and their prices vary, from $175 to $500.
Ms. Fusaro has come up with some go-to spots: an outdoor dog heads to a hiking trail; a couch potato gets a sofa; and an active pooch frolics on a beach.
She never heads out without a squeaky toy, animal calls, and her "secret weapon," a coach's whistle.
"It only works once" to get pooches' attention, Fusaro said.
In front of the camera, some dogs are timid and some are hams, McKenna said, but her secret for a successful shoot with any canine personality is patience.
"Never force an animal to do anything," McKenna said. "If an animal doesn't want to do it, you are not going to get the image you are after anyway."
There's not much forcing to get Mak's two mutts to mug. She snaps them frequently on her cellphone, but Teti was able to capture something deeper without intruding.
"I could never get the true joy of them on the cellphone," Mak said.

Thursday, May 22, 2014

POSH AND LIVELY FILM ENGAGEMENT INSPIRATION SHOOT

There’s just something about film photography that I love. I’m guessing many people love it for the same reasons I do. Maybe it’s the soft ambiance or the lovely neutral quality. Whatever it is I adore it!
Some of the best film photography I’m attracted to has the lightness of whipped butter. You know what I mean? Where everything looks creamy and soft?
Today’s posh and lively film engagement inspiration shoot, shot by Matoli Keely Photography, fits my likes in film photography beautifully. Nerissa & Rich are a sweet couple who were friends for a long time before starting to date. And while they’re not officially engaged, yet…they offered to model for this shoot to show how lovely it is when true love shines through!
Washington DC Engagement Session - see more at http://fabyoubliss.com

Washington DC Engagement Session - see more at http://fabyoubliss.com

Washington DC Engagement Session - see more at http://fabyoubliss.comPhotographer: Matoli Keely Photography // Location: 1886 Victorian Farmhouse on 1000 acre tobacco farm in Mt. Airy MD // Hair & Makeup by Jordan K. Winn & Co. // Dresses: Mark & James by Badgeley Mischka Pepper Dress and Slate & Willow Madeline Sheath dress both via Rent the Runway
Thanks for stopping by!

WHY 35mm?

Why not 36mm or 40 or 50 or even 57 like Heinz?

Photo by Sara

Well, believe it or not, for an answer we have to go back to Thomas A. Edison (1847-1931), American inventor and a national icon of the 20th century. Edison, as many scientists and other learned individuals since the 18th century, knew about the physiological phenomenon known by the theory of persistence of vision, i.e., the ability of human vision to retain for an instant the image of a moving object or scene looked upon. After inventing the repeating telegraph, the incandescent light, and the talking machine, as his early ‘cylinder record player’ was called, Edison is reported to have declared, “I will do for the eye, what I have done for the ear!..." Having at his disposal the resources of the Edison Laboratory, he assigned the task of creating a moving picture machine to a laboratory mechanic and amateur photographer, William Kennedy Laurie Dickson (1860-1936), recently arrived from England. Edison of course knew about the 1878 sequential image photography of the trotting horse photographed in California by Eadweard Muybridge, the Englishman (1830-1904). He was also aware of the sequential imaging of bird flight by the Frenchman, Etienne Jules Marey (1830-1904). Perhaps these pre-existing procedures among other such cinematographic developments in England, Germany and America are probably what led the US Supreme Court to issue a statement in 1902 that the Edison claim of inventing motion pictures was not valid.

Dickson worked diligently but was initially unsuccessful with his design concepts. One of which was the application of tiny photographic images or ‘microdots’ to use a latter day designation, upon the curved surface of the Edison phonograph wax cylinders. Not only did this prove difficult to accomplish coincident to the cylinder grooves, but also its proposed use required a microscopic viewing device to be employed while the phonograph played, let alone the fact that the Edison talking machines then in use at public venues used earphones for each customer.

At about this time an individual in another burgeoning industry was thinking of ways to improve his product.George Eastman (1854-1932), after placing on the market in 1885 his “American Film” in a roll holder adaptable to the then common glass plate cameras, thus eliminating the need of glass photographic plates, had in 1888 brought forth the KODAK. This unique 6 ½”X 3 ¼”X 3 ¾” box-shaped camera reduced the photographic process as far as the amateur was concerned, to Eastman’s slogan, “You Press the Button. We do the Rest!” Each camera when purchased, came loaded with a roll of film, 2 ¾” (70mm) wide and about 23 feet long, enough for 100 pictures. The owner, after taking all the pictures, returned the KODAK in its leather case back to the factory. The film was developed, producing 2 ½” circular pictures; each mounted on card stock and together with the KODAK, now reloaded with film, were sent back to the customer. Initially the silver gelatin photographic emulsion had a paper base and the images were stripped off the paper during development, preparatory to mounting. But soon Eastman came upon a superior cellulose base and from 1889 with the introduction of the KODAK No.1 camera, the Eastman film, which was similar to today’s roll films for black & white photography, became a big seller.

Photo by Lala Qurra H

The KODAK revolutionized the field of photography both technically and financially by providing the public a camera easy to operate and an ensuing large consumer base whose dollars, companies would attempt to win. The word Kodak soon entered the English vernacular of the day as a verb, “going kodaking”, “I’ve been kodaked”, “Don’t kodak me!” and even an Eastman publication named “Kodakery“, referred to “the Kodaker”. Some contemporary publications can be found using the word Kodak to refer to any small, portable camera.

At the Edison Laboratory, it was soon realized that a flexible strip of images, not unlike that which Marey was using in his rifle-like camera for shooting bird flight, could be made to move past a light source and projected on to a viewing surface. Dickson also understood that the new Eastman film with its cellulose base would better sustain the rapid movements necessary for the persistence of vision in a viewing machine. He acquired some of the bulk film being produced by the Eastman Company, slit the standard 70mm wide film strip in half lengthwise and punching regularly spaced perforations along the edge for traction and image registration, devised 35mm wide strips of film of about 50 feet long, carrying images 18mm X 24mm in size on the film strip. The rest as they say, is history.

The Edison Laboratory developed a moving picture viewing machine, a four foot high, and about two by three foot square wood cabinet, named the Kinetoscope and an immobile, electrically powered motion picture camera, the Kinetograph. The moving images inside the “peep show” contrivance were viewed by one person at a time, from a viewing ocular on the cabinet top after electric direct current was turned on by the Kinetoscope attendant, and later as an improvement, by the customer inserting a coin in a slot. At once,“Kinetoscope Parlors” proved very popular as a public entertainment venue, although they soon lost favor to the idea of picture projection on to a wall or screen, to which Edison did not choose to invest his inventive talents. Edison also neglected to patent the Kinetoscope outside the United States, which permitted others overseas like the Lumiere Brothers in France to quickly copy the machine and together with other American inventors and entrepreneurs hasten the development of motion picture technology. Various motion picture film formats were in use during the early cinema days, but by 1909 the Edison 35mm film format with 18mm X 24mm images was adopted as an industry standard.

This rapidly developing industry soon found that after filming a movie using thousands of feet of film stock, they had unusable short lengths of film, “short runs” as they were called. Concurrent with these situations was the new interest by camera manufacturers to design cameras to use this new “miniature” film format. Beginning about 1904 some two dozen different American and foreign cameras for 35mm cine film were put on the market or patented, but the German Leitz Leica camera marketed in 1926 proved to be the most commercially successful. Because of the graininess of the emulsion of available cine film stock and a preference for a horizontal orientation of picture view, the Leica designer Oskar Barnack (1879-1936), increased the Leica film format from 18mm X 24mm to 24mm X 36mm, with the film traversing horizontally in the camera, although the Leica was not the first camera to utilize this concept.

By the 1930s this ‘small camera’ idea using 35mm film had caught the imagination of photographers, both amateur and professional worldwide. Pre-eminent were the finely made Leica and Zeiss Ikon Contax cameras from Germany with their extensive array of interchangeable lenses and numerous accessories. However, their high cost (several hundred Dollars in America) prevented the average photo enthusiast from participating in the new “candid camera” idea. In the early 1930s the Eastman Kodak Company had acquired the German camera manufacturing firm, Dr. August Nagel Kamera-Werk Stuttgart, from which in 1934 they placed on the market a superb small folding 35mm camera, the Kodak Retina. Although without interchangeable lenses or a large array of accessories, it was a precisely crafted camera with an excellent f:3.5 50mm lens, a multi-speed shutter and a price in America of $57.50.

Concurrently with the introduction of the Retina Camera, Eastman Kodak Company introduced the Daylight Loading Cartridge, a pre-loaded 35mm film magazine. This quantum step towards a universal film containment and supply cassette for 35mm cameras, fostered by the increasing interest of 35mm photography, caused many low cost 35mm cameras to come forth in increased numbers in the 1930s. In America the International Radio Corporation of Ann Arbor, Michigan, manufacturers of table radios with plastic cases introduced the Argus Model A Candid Camera in 1936. It had a simple optical viewfinder, an f:4.5 50mm lens with a multi-speed shutter housed in a black plastic body with stamped metal back at $12.50, soon reduced to $10. A Candid Camera for Everyman! After two years, and now called International Research Corporation, they introduced the Argus Model C series of which the Argus Model C3, (1939-66) sometimes referred to in the trade as the ‘brick’ because of its shape and durability, held an American camera sales record at almost 2 1/2 million sold.

A radio parts supplier in Chicago, turned camera manufacturer and becoming the Candid Camera Corporation of America, introduced the Bakelite and metal bodied 35mm Perfex “Speed Candid” camera in 1938. It was the first American standard (full frame) 35mm camera with focal plane shutter and was available with f:3.5 or f:2.8 50mm lenses. There soon followed an extensive line of Perfex 35mm cameras ending in 1959. The Universal Camera Corporation of New York had already in 1933, entered the ranks of small format cameras with its tiny plastic UniveX Model A at a price of 39 cents! It used a special imported 35mm roll film that gave 6 exposures of 1 ½ by 1 1/8 inches. In 1938 they introduced the unique 35mm UniveX Mercury camera with leather trimmed, cast aluminum alloy body, fitted with f:3.5, f:2.7 or f:2.0 35mm lenses, a focal plane shutter and using a proprietary spooled 35mm roll film stock as before. The Mercury camera provided 19mm X 24mm images (almost the cine format!) and its successor, the 1946 Universal Mercury II camera gave 65 like exposures on the standard 36-exposure cartridge of 35mm film. In 1938 the Eastman Kodak Company introduced its first American made (full frame) 35mm cameras, the Kodak 35 Camera series - the range finder versions of 1940-51 in particular, being excellent picture takers but often outsold in the marketplace by the contemporary Argus C3. Finally In 1941, Eastman Kodak brought forth America’s finest 35mm camera, the landmark Kodak Ektra with its series of superlative interchangeable Ektar lenses and singular accessories, only too soon to be eclipsed by the consumer production restraints of World War II and finally by postwar economic considerations.

© Kirk Kekatos 2000-2009

For camera references see:
McKeown’s Price Guide to Antique & Classic Cameras, 2005-06, 12th edition

The KODAK – pg. 472
Leitz Leica ca. 1932 - pg. 601
Zeiss Ikon Contax ca. 1932 - pg. 1043
Kodak Retina 1934 – pg. 520
Argus Model A - pg. 72
Argus Model C3 - pg. 74
Perfex “Speed Candid” - pg. 175
UniveX Model A - pg. 940
UniveX Mercury - pg. 938
Universal Mercury II - pg. 938
Kodak 35 - pg. 508
Kodak Ektra - pg. 492

(via Chicago Photographic and Camera Collectors Society)

Camera Affection of Cara Jo Miller

Cara Jo Miller is a photographer, designer, knitter, and runner who lives in Downtown Detroit, US. She has a serious obsession with film cameras, in fact she has nearly 60 film cameras in her possession. Most of them still work!


She shared about her vintage camera collection:

I have a camera collecting sickness. I can tell you when and where it started too. March 2006, with a Polaroid 420 Land Camera I got for $0.79 at St. Vinny’s Thrift Shop in Marquette. I frequently shopped at St. Vinny’s and loved to look at the old vintage cameras they had behind the glass and thought “what would I ever do with that, it’s not ‘cool’.”. One day I saw this Polaroid sticking out of the camera bin with all the other cheap 35mm $0.50 cameras. I figured, what the heck, it’s only $0.79! After much research I found out what type of film it needed, where I could get it, how to take photos with it, etc. One of the arms had broken for the bellows and I had to super glue it back together, but it worked.

I took about 10 or so packs of film with that camera, carrying a timer and a trash bag around with me when I would go out photographing things. I learned about Polaroid transfers, how you can get the emulsion off the photo paper and put it on something else. I also did some Polaroid Negative Transfers, which was tricky to do while wandering around taking photos.

The point is that this $0.79 camera changed everything for me in terms of photography. I had a new taste for photography. I wanted to know about all types of cameras, all film types, uses, everything. I appreciated the differences that the camera had on the film and realized that the camera and the photographer make the photo worth while. I can achieve that grainy, soft blur, vingette look that people try to duplicate in Photoshop with one click, on a camera from 1953 that cost me $4. You should be pretty jealous of that.


Pictures above showing Cara's vintage camera collection on shelves, from top to bottom left to right:
  • Kodak Tourist
  • Kodak Six-20 Junior
  • Contaflex
  • Kodak Vigilant Six-20 Junior
  • Kodak Duaflex II
  • Kodak Instamatic X35
  • Kodak Brownie Bullet
  • Argus 75
  • Polaroid SX-70 (non-working)
  • Kodak Retina
  • Argus C3
  • Polaroid SX-70 (working)
  • Kalimar Reflex
  • Kodak Brownie Bullet II
  • Ricoh S2
  • Kodak Hawkeye
  • Yashica TLR
Over time I started collecting cameras, from Polaroid to Kodak to that one off brand no one ever heard of. A lot were gifts, most are from thrift stores or antique shops, and a few are from ebay. But all of them are mine, and I know all of them like they are my children. I know how to open one of my Polaroid SX-70s because the mirror is stuck flipped up, and how many turns it takes in my Kodak Brownie Bullet for one exposure of 35mm film (it’s supposed to take 127mm, but I modified it).

My collection has grown to nearly 50 (now nearly 60) film cameras. I have always wanted to use every single one of them, but never had the time or the money to do it. With my Photo a Day project I’ve found the perfect opportunity to do it.
Article by: Shooting Film.Net

A Brief History of Kodak Kodachrome Film

Image © Michael L. Raso

Kodachrome is a brand name for a non-substantive, color reversal film introduced by Eastman Kodak in 1935. It was one of the first successful color materials and was used for both cinematography and still photography.

Before Kodachrome film was marketed, color photography had been achieved using additive methods and materials such as Autochrome and Dufaycolor, which were the first practical color processes. These had several disadvantages because they used a réseau filter made from discrete color elements that were visible upon enlargement. The finished transparencies absorbed between 70% and 80% of light upon projection, requiring very bright projection lamps, especially for large projections. Using the subtractive method, these disadvantages could be avoided.

The first, commercially unsuccessful, Kodak product called Kodachrome was invented by John Capstaff. Capstaff, a former portrait photographer and physics and engineering student, had already worked on colour photography before he joined C.K. Mees and other former Wratten and Wainright employees in their move to Rochester in 1912 - 1913, after Eastman had bought that company to persuade Mees to come and work for him. Capstaff's Kodachrome film was a subtractive colour transparency that only used two colours: green and red. It combined two negatives, one exposed through a red filter, the other through a green filter. After processing, the silver images were bleached and the bleached part of the gelatin hardened. The negative exposed through the green filter was then dyed red-orange, the red exposed negative was dyed blue-green. The dyes would soak into the unhardened part of the gelatin, producing a positive image. They were then combined on a glass plate, producing a transparency that did show a surprisingly good (for a two colour process) colour rendition in portraits. Capstaff's Kodachrome was made commercially available in 1915. It was also adapted for use as a movie film. Today, this first version of Kodachrome is mostly forgotten, completely overshadowed by the next Kodak product bearing the name Kodachrome.

The next, and famous, version of Kodachrome was invented in the early 1930s by two professional musicians,Leopold Godowsky, Jr. and Leopold Mannes, who were also university-trained scientists.

Kodachrome photo by Chalmers Butterfield of Shaftesbury
Avenue from Piccadilly Circus, in the West End of London,
c. 1949. (via Wikipedia)
Mannes and Godowsky first took an interest in colour photography when in 1917, still highschool pupils at the time, they saw a movie called Our Navy, a movie made using a four colour additive process. Both agreed the colour was terrible. After reading up on the subject in the library they started to experiment with additive colour processes. Their experiments were continued during their college years, eventually producing a camera having two lenses that project images side by side on a single strip of film. The colour rendition of this additive two-colour process was not too bad, but aligning the two lenses of the projector needed was too difficult.

Their experiments, which continued after they finished college, turned from multiple lenses that produce multiple, differently coloured images that had to be combined to form the final transparency, to multiple layered film in which the different colour images were already combined, perfectly aligned. Such a multi-layered film had already been invented and patented in 1912 by the German inventor Rudolph Fischer. Each of the three layers in the proposed film would be sensitive to one of the three primary colours, and each of the three layers would have substances (called "colour couplers") embedded in them that would form a dye of the required colour when combined with the by-products of the developing silver image. When the silver images are bleached away, the three colour dye image would remain. Fischer himself did not find a way to stop the colour couplers and colour sensitizing dyes from wandering from one layer into the other, where they would produce unwanted colours.

Mannes and Godowsky followed that route, started experimenting with colour couplers, but their experiments were hindered by a lack of money, supplies and facilities. In 1922 Robert Wood, a friend of Mannes, wrote a letter to Kodak's chief scientist Mees, introducing Mannes and Godowksy and their experiments, and asking if Mees could let them use the Kodak facilities for a few days. Mees offered to help, and after meeting with Mannes and Godowsky agreed to supply them with multi-layer emulsions made to Mannes and Godowsky's specifications. Financial aid, in the form of a $20,000 loan, was supplied by the investement firm Kuhn, Loeb and Company, who had Mannes and Godowsky's experiments brought to their attention by a secretary working for that firm Mannes had acquainted.

By 1924 they were able to patent a two-colour process. The important part of that patented process was a process called controlled diffusion. By timing how long it took for an image to form in the top layer, but not yet in the next layer beneath that one, they began to solve the problem that Fischer could not. Using this time-controlled way of processing one layer at a time, they could create the dye image of the required colour in only that layer in which it is required. Some three years later they were still experimenting using this controlled diffusion method of separating the colours in the multi-layer emulsion, but by then they had decided that instead of incorporating the colour couplers into the emulsion layers themselves, they could be added to the developing chemicals, solving the problem of wandering colour couplers. The only part left of Fischer's original problem with a multi-layer emulsion were the wandering sensitizing dyes.

In 1929 money ran out, and Mees decided to help them once more. Mees knew that the solution to the problem of the wandering dyes had already been found by one of Kodak's own scientists, Leslie Brooker. So he gave Mannes and Godowsky enough money to pay off the loan Kuhn Loeb had supplied and offered them a yearly salary. He also gave them a three-year deadline to come up with a finished and commercially viable product.

Afghan Girl. The famous Steve McCurry's
photograph was shot in December 1984 by
Kodachrome. (via Wikipedia)
Not long before the three-year period would expire, at the end of 1933, Mannes and Godowsky still had not managed to come up with anything usable, and thought their experiments would be terminated by Kodak. Their only chance for survival was to invent something in a hurry. Something that the company could put into production and capitalise. Mees however granted them a one year extension, and still not having solved all the technical challenges they had to solve, they eventually presented Mees with a two-colour movie process in 1934. Two-colour, it must be noted, as was the original Kodachrome invented by John Capstaff some 20 years earlier.

Mees immediately set things in motion to produce and market this film, but just before Kodak was about to introduce the two-colour film in 1935, Mannes and Godowsky completed work on the long awaited but no longer expected, much better, three colour version. On April 15, 1935, this new film, borrowing the name from Capstaff's process, was formally announced.

It was first sold in 1935 as 16 mm movie film. and the following year it was made available in 8 mm movie film, and in 35mm and 828 formats for stills cameras. In later years, Kodachrome was produced in a wide variety of film formats including 120 and 4x5, and in ISO/ASA values ranging from 8 to 200.

Until its manufacturers were taken over by rival film manufacturer GAF view-master stereo reels used Kodachrome films.

Competing transparency films, such as Fujifilm Fujichrome and Kodak Ektachrome use the simpler, quicker, and more accessible E-6 process. This eroded Kodachrome's market share, as the quality of competing films improved during the 1980s and 1990s. As digital photography reduced the demand for all film after 2000, Kodachrome sales further declined. On June 22, 2009, Kodak announced it would no longer manufacture Kodachrome film and cited declining demand. During its heyday, many Kodak and independent laboratories processed Kodachrome, but by 2010, one Kodak-certified facility remained: Dwayne's Photo in Parsons, Kansas. On July 14, 2010, it was announced that the last roll of Kodachrome manufactured had been developed by Dwayne's for photographer Steve McCurry on assignment for National Geographic. Although McCurry retains ownership of the slides, prints of the 36 slides are permanently housed at the George Eastman House in Rochester, New York and most of the pictures have been published on the Internet byVanity Fair magazine.

Image © Gary Grossman

Kodachrome was the subject of Paul Simon's song "Kodachrome", and Kodachrome Basin State Park in Utah was named after it, becoming the only park named for a brand of film.

(via Wikipedia)

Morocco Travel Photography by Tomasz Wagner

Tomasz Wagner is a Vancouver wedding photographer by profession and a traveler at heart. "What intrigues me about photography is the art of telling a truth about the moments behind subjects, moods, and emotions - whether it's a wedding or a scene from daily life," he says. "Achieving this honest storytelling motivates me in my work, whether at home or abroad."

Below is a selection of wonderful photos of Wagner's Morocco trip in 2013 which was entirely documented on film: Kodak 160 on a Contax G2, to be specific. You can view more photos of the whole trip on his website here.




Wednesday, May 21, 2014

FILM/CAMERA GUIDE UPDATES.

Negative0-34-0A(1)Lomography CN 800, Zenit TTL
I’ve had the Pentax for slightly more than three months and finally took the time to add it onto theCamera Guide – it’s my absolute go-to camera now and I can’t wait to make more pictures with it. Also, the Kodak ProFoto XL 100 is now in the Film Guide; I’ve used a few more rolls recently and it has definitely performed consistently. True to life tones are right up my alley!
And if you have a keen eye, you might have noticed that I’ve put up a button on the sidebar that links you to the Curating Cuteness shop selling a film kit for beginners. I’ve had lots of emails asking which films and where to purchase them from to use with various cameras and decided to come up with a kit of six different consumer 35mm films that are largely reliable and easy to produce great results with. If film is easily accessible where you live, do stock up on my top six recommendations, especially if you’re new to film photography; if film is not easily accessible where you live, I hope this kit comes in handy. 
Article from: Curating Cuteness Blog