Monday, March 31, 2014

A Journey from Germany to Turkey

A journey from Germany to Turkey, to photograph with vintage film equipment and produce a series of prints.






I was trained as a musician. Three years ago, a band I was in was invited to play behind R. Stevie Moore, a legendary underground home-recording musician, on his first tour, ever. He was 59 at the time (and we were all about half his age- he liked to refer to us as his "boy band"). None of us- Stevie, the boy band, nor our manager, had any touring experience. We thought that the tour might be a modest two week American jaunt, and even then we didn't know what to expect. But as Stevie had been releasing music since 1969 and had developed a huge cult fanbase who had generally resigned themselves to the fact that they would never see him live, the media excitement about the tour began to grow rapidly and so did the bookings. Helped along by shout-outs from some of the more successful musicians who had come up admiring Stevie, such as Ariel Pink, MGMT, and Mike Watt, we suddenly found ourselves booked for a three month international tour. Like everything Stevie has ever done, the whole scenario was generally unprecedented and unpredictable. And like his music, which if anything surely deserves the description "diverse", so were our bookings. We played house parties and we headlined festivals. We went from having four private suites and a chef in the French Riviera one night to sleeping on the floor of the van in a German truck stop the very next.


About a year before all of this, I had decided to take up photography, purely as a diversion (or I could say, just as an excuse to occasionally go take a walk around). My musical training had instilled in me a certain self-criticizing attitude, an acute awareness of what the musical institutions did and didn't consider proper talent and technique; in other words- an unshakable feeling that I didn't practice enough. I decided that I would stay as ignorant as possible about photography, learn nothing about technique, familiarize myself with none of the masters or their work, and own as little and as cheap equipment as possible. So I got hold of a toy plastic film camera- being outside of the digital realm was a near certain safeguard against any possibility of accidentally throwing my hat into the ring of current photographic practice. And I started to take night walks and to take some photos.

Touring is sometimes grueling business. Stevie likes to remind us that we're "in the Army now". Almost every day is: rising early after going to sleep late, riding in a van for maybe six or eight hours, loading and checking equipment, waiting to be fed, waiting to play, playing, waiting to get paid and get out of the venue, waiting to be taken to wherever some type of bedding is being provided, and waiting for the party to be over in order to get any sleep at all. I'm not complaining, I'm just saying how it is. There is also, ironically, a lack of opportunity to be engaged in any real creative work on tour outside of the performances, with the schedule being what it is.


Funny thing that I had once taken up photography just as an excuse to go take evening walks: In this new milieu, these photo-hunting hikes became pivotal to my sanity. Imagine being in a magnificent foreign city that you've never been in before and may never be in again, and having at best one or two hours to explore it. And imagine having this experience over and over again, every day for a month or two. There comes to be (at least for me) an almost explosive need, an impossible desire, to sprint and stand still at the same time, to see everything there is to see and yet to stop and take in any little sight as deeply as I can, to engage in utter novelty while looking for a restive moment of familiarity. Not only this, but as I'm accustomed to spending many hours a day working on music, my creative impulses took on a similar tension; they demanded some release, some focus, something outside of eat-sleep-drive, some work. At once I found that as soon as we began to cross through the suburbs towards the center of any new town, my eyes were fixed out the window, assessing the tone, style, light and color of the place, and I wondered whether I wasn't too hungry to skip dinner if it happened to fall during that time just before dusk when the light is best.

R. Stevie and the crew are now preparing to embark on our fourth summer abroad. I have some good friends in several European cities, and there's at least a handful of cities that I can get around without a map (I can get around any city without a map, but maybe not always with the certainty that I'll find my way back to the gig before the rest of the band starts to worry). Last year I had my first photography show, a solo show of ninety-one prints, put up in five days between gigs in Moscow and Mexico City. It was largely comprised of pictures taken on the road, and it sold out. After years of focusing exclusively on street and low-light photography, I have extended my practice into portraiture. Though I've moved beyond plastic cameras, I still work exclusively with film.

Two things have never happened, though: I have never toured as a solo musician, and I have never had the chance to see Eastern Europe.

The Project:

I propose this year to depart from R. Stevie Moore and the boys at the end of our spring tour in Western Europe and to head east, towards Istanbul, to photograph with vintage film equipment, and to produce a series of hand made prints from these images. I am working to secure solo performances along the way, targeting Austria, Slovakia, Croatia, Hungary, Bulgaria and Turkey. Traveling alone and performing less frequently will radically alter my opportunities to explore, to engage, and to photograph.

Some of the overhead travel costs (i.e., flights) will be provided by the band. But, contrary to popular portrayal, guys in bands do not make a ton of money. We usually have to do a lot of juggling just to make sure we have apartments to come home to. In order to plan this solo tour, I will need to commit in advance to a flight itinerary and to performance engagements, and I will need to be certain that I can fulfill these commitments. This will mean bus and train fare, food and lodging.

I also have a devoted belief in the importance of film photography as an art. The motive and practice of travel photography is a unique and special thing when working with film. I come across something that I didn't know was going to be there. I take one or two snaps and have no idea how they'll turn out; they might not be any good. I walk away and know that I will never see that place again. The image, when eventually it comes to exist, is imbued with a feeling of chronology; the moment-in-time of a photograph relates in a real way to the moment as-it-was, something that had no guarantee of ever existing, and was certainly bound to be lost in any case.

Film photography is becoming ever more expensive, though, as it becomes less popular. With medium-format film, it costs about a dollar a shot before getting any scans or prints, just to buy and develop the film. This could easily cost thirty to forty dollars a day just to take the pictures. Later printing, which I do by hand in one of New York's last surviving public darkrooms with true analog enlarging and printing equipment, costs around fifteen dollars an hour, plus the cost of photo paper. It can cost around twenty dollars just to make a good print of one image.

I have chosen not to focus here on the musical side of the project, not because it isn't deeply important to me, but because I feel that the photographic element is something that I can truly and freely share with anybody who cares to connect with me on the internet. The greatest reward of any artistic undertaking is the opportunity to transmit it to an audience. In music, this happens in performance. But the motivating drive for me to expand and deepen my photographic practice comes from the response that I get from sharing my work openly online. I have continued to receive attention and appreciation from friends and strangers alike on Facebook and on Flickr (and I have discovered endless inspiration through the work of others in these forums, as well). I am now seeking financial support from this online community in order to expand this body of work, which as always will be shared freely and openly with that community.

But don't forget to check out the Rewards offered for your contributions! Souvenirs, custom made prints, and even a photo session of your own! No need to be purely altruistic!



Thank you so, so much for hearing my story, for supporting my work, and for being a friend of the arts. May you all have many rewarding journeys of your own. -Wilson







Sunday, March 30, 2014

7 Reasons for Returning to Film Photography

By  
A quick look on eBay will reveal thousands of low use, high quality film cameras for incredibly low prices. It is perhaps the best time ever to buy a film camera, but why would you want to go back to film when today’s digital cameras produce such stunning images. Well, here are some reasons.
The Look of Film.
Many photographers today spend huge amounts of camera time and post processing time to try and recreate the film look. There is a definite and pleasing look to the quality of film, it’s impossible to describe with mere words and it’s not necessarily a better look than digital, its just different. So the easiest way to create the film look?  Use a film camera.
The Feel of Film
Maybe it sounds a little crazy, but those of us brought up in the days of Kodak, Fuji, Agfa and Ilford will tell you there is something very special about putting your hands into your pocket and pulling out a roll of film. Placing the leader of a roll of 35mm into a Nikon, unwrapping a roll of 120, whilst trying not to expose too much of the film to light, simple skills that marked you as a photographer.
The Cost
It might seem odd that I include the cost as a reason to return to film but bear with me on this one. Every time you put a roll of film in your camera, it has cost you money. That cost continues with the development and printing. Every time you take a poor picture, it has cost you, personally. But the counterpoint to that is that every time you a good picture, you will appreciate the value of your knowledge of photography. It’s too easy these days to rely on the camera to create the image. Delete the poor ones keep the good ones. When you have to pay for each image, you will learn to make each one count, and that will stand you in good stead when you return to your DSLR.

Learning to Understand Exposure.
The previous reason, leads us onto learning exposure. Although film is generally regarded to have a higher tonal range than digital, is has a lower tolerance to incorrect exposure, especially if you are using transparency. An underexposed image cannot be recovered by merely shifting the levels, it needs to be right when the shutter clicks and you need to understand what is happening when the exposure is made.
Understanding Color Temperature
Unlike a digital camera where you can set a color balance or let the camera do it automatically, you have to buy the right type of film for the right type of light. The first time you use a roll of daylight film under tungsten lighting, you will start to understand the importance of the color of light.
Pro Cameras at Low Prices
For many of us former film users, cameras like Nikon F5’s, Hasselblads, even Leica’s, were the stuff of dreams. They idea of one day owning one of these marvels of imaging fueled our passion for photography. Take a quick trawl through eBay today, and you will find mint quality samples of these cameras for less than the price of a base level DSLR.
Do it Yourself
For aficionados of the digital darkroom this may sound odd, but getting your hands dirty by developing and printing your own films is in my personal opinion, one of the great highlights of film photography. Its easy enough to make a temporary darkroom in not much more space than it you would need for a desktop computer and A3 printer. The sight of a large black and white print, slowly revealing itself under the gloom of a red safe light should thrill even the most hardened digital darkroom enthusiast.
So there you have it, if you have a hankering for trying out film, there are little or no obstacles. Trawl through eBay, or your local camera store, bag yourself a bargain. Most professional camera stores still sell film and will also know where you can get it developed and printed. If at the end of the day you still prefer digital, old film cameras make great ornaments for your home.
Jason Row is a British photographer based in Ukraine. Follow him on Facebook or see his work at The Odessa Files.

Thursday, March 27, 2014

Exposing the Millennial Generation to Film!

undefined
Blog by Amy C. Davies
For the past two years the Film Photography Project (FPP) has donated cameras and film to an Oregon high school. Armed with four 35mm SLR camera, two 120 Debonair cameras and 147 rolls of film the students hit the streets to shoot.
In a small high school in the Pacific Northwest one teacher is exposing his millennial generation students to the world of film.
Scio, Oregon is a rural town situated between Eugene and Portland. Jonathon Bernard is language arts teacher at Scio High School and he is also the photography instructor for the student body of nearly 300 students. Three years ago Jonathon began using film camera for his own work. “At first I had a typical point and shoot that I just did snapshots with.”, he said. Then his father gave him a Pentax K1000.
Jonathon said, “It all just happened at the same time. I was able to relearn that (Pentax K1000) as I was teaching the kids.”
Photography 1 & 2 classes are made up of students from all grades. Twenty-one students signed up for the class in the first semester of 2014.
“The first year I did it, some where kind of interested. Most didn't continue on. It was sort of a novelty that I think wore off”, he said. But as the years have gone on the students have become more interested.
Jonathon says the interest has steadily grown. “The last couple of years particularly there's been a lot of more people interested in it. I think it's the art angle of it and that people are interested in the class itself and wanting to create things.”, Jonathon said.
He also thinks some students who live in an on demand, instant gratification world enjoy having to wait. He said it may be a “push back” to digital. “They like actually crafting something.”, he said.
He tells the students, “when you are metering the light and you're turning this dial and that dial and that knob, if a picture actually turns out, you own it.”
The students have been using several Pentax K1000 cameras some of which were donated by the FPP. Michael Raso from the FPP says the collaboration with Scio High School fits perfectly into the philosophy of the podcast. “The FPP has become a global resource for both people who are looking to discard their old film cameras and for groups like the students at Scio School who actually need film equipment. Re-purposing and donating the gear out to students is really what we're all about!”, Michael said.
above: Katherine Miles photo shot by fellow student Dakota Cook / below: Photo by Katherine Miles
Student Katherine Miles has embraced the concept of making a picture. “I have to admit that using film was a bit tricky at first, but I felt like I could really appreciate photography as an art after using it.”, she said. “We only had so much film, so it led us to really focus on getting a perfect shot. I think it was a lot more exciting to use film, but that's not the point.” Miles appreciates the technical aspects of shooting with film. “ She said, “I think film cameras allow you to really capture contrast, and just better exposure and resolution in general.”
Jonathon said that it is really a matter of personality when a student decides whether to continue on with film or go to digital shooting. “Some of them can't handle it. Some of them like the x-factor. I don't know if it's going to turn out or not for a couple of days and some really truly can't deal with it.”
above: Nora Mikolas shot by fellow student Elizabeth Ortega-Valdez / below: photo by Nora Mikolas
Scio High School doesn't have a darkroom so Jonathon has come up with his own workflow. He develops the students' film during his prep period and rolls the reels using a dark bag. He said the students are intrigued by the process. He uses the sink in the staff room which is next door and hangs the drying film in a corner of his classroom.
He said keeping his classroom at 70 degrees helps to “maintain the fluid temperature at 68 degrees”.
Jonathon then scans the negatives on an Epson V500 scanner for the students to see.
Jonathon said the students have been creative in finding subjects for their photos in a small town. “I'm kind of fascinated with as small as the town is, I really don't see many duplicate pictures.”, he said. “They tend to find different angles or different things.” He said they have one business area in town, Main Street. This year students are coming up with new subjects from alleys he didn't know existed.
“They liked the way the dumpster happened to line up with the door, the geometry just sort of worked out.”, he said. “What struck me was how similar types of friends and families and culture can still see different things in the same place they occupy day after day after day for sixteen, eighteen years.”
above: Elizabeth Ortega-Valdez shot by fellow student Nora Mikolas/ below: photo by Elizabeth Ortega-Valdez
Senior, Elizabeth Ortega-Valdez has found an unexpected appreciation for film photography because of the class. “Being able to take nice pictures was never my specialty unless it was with my phone.”, she said. “Then for my senior year, I wanted to take photography class. I thought it's be easy since it was just taking pictures. At first I thought that digital was the way to go for the color and whatnot, but there's something about film that it more real.” Ortega-Valez said about film, “It's comforting.”
Amy C. Davies is a regular contributor to The Film Photography Project. Check out her images on Flickr - https://www.flickr.com/photos/capefilmshooter/

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

problem developing tri-x

Matthew Headrick , Mar 17, 2014; 08:42 p.m.
Recently, all of the Tri-X I have developed (both 120 and 35mm) has turned out like this. I'm using HC-110 dilution B.
undefined
5 more minutes in fixer. undefined

Get Your Glow On! PolyPan F BW Film!

Since announcing that PolyPan F would be available in the FPP On-Line Store in 36 exposure rolls, the response was so great that we sold out in less than 24 hours! The new batch is now available! I'm so thrilled at the enthusiasm over this  unique black and white film and I hope to see your PolyPan images! If you haven't visited the FPP Group on Flickr, I hope you will - to share your Poly F images! Super thanks to Mike B! It was his idea to make available 35mm rolls (as the film was only previously available as bulk-load film). Thanks, Mike B!
- Michael Raso, FPP

SHOOTING POLYPAN F!
Guest Blog by Mike B.
As many know, I am a large advocate of Polypan F film.  It's a Cinecopy film, that has little to no anti-halation layer, and can give beautiful bloom effects in bright light.  It is also a very thin film, but surprisingly doesn't scratch easily, perhaps because it is a cinefilm it needs to be robust.

There has been some speculation as to the origins of this film.  Anywhere from it being a Ilford PanF type of film, or some late-run Agfa film.  But in truth, there is only speculation, but word is, and this is still, again, speculation, a Last-Run B&W Cinecopy film from the Shostka Film Company in Russia.  They have been defunct since around 2000 when the Svema film company bought it, which also closed down in 2006.  One thing that I know, is that I just love using this film.  Sure, it's slow, and sure it isn't the most fine grained film there is, but that's fine with me.

undefined
above: Desiree Saetia - Photo by Michael Raso / Canon T60 / Canon FD 50mm f1.2 lens / PolyPan F BW film
Whenever I want fine grain, I'll use Ilford PanF+ 50, or Kodak TMAX 100, or even Ilford Delta 100.  Those films are super fine grained.
But when I want grit, contrast and beautiful glowing images, I use Polypan F!
undefined
above: "Cold Stone Ingredients" - Canon T-80 35mm SLR - Canon AC 35-70 Æ’/3.5-4.5 Macro / Polypan F @EI80 - Developed in Diafine 5+4
below: "A Pair Of Exaktas" - Rolleicord V TLR - Schneider-Xenar Kreuznach 75mm Æ’/3.5
Polypan F - Developed in TMAX Developer 1+9
Or perhaps there's just something there that I cannot put my finger on, and just have to accept that for as long as Polypan is around, I will continue to use it...

A truly wonderful film!

Red Rock Canyon Park – Las Vegas Nevada – Film Photography

YAAAYYYYYY!!!  I heart film….as if you didn’t already know that:)  These are the film images I shot at our styled shoot while we were out in Vegas.  Unfortunately there weren’t a whole heap of them….and here’s why.  So evidently you can’t run 800 ISO film (or higher) thru the x-ray at the airport.  This on top of the fact that my bag was pretty much over the weight limit on the way out there the 800 film had to stay home.  I am a nervous nelly going thru security at airports and to hand them a bag and demand that they not scan it scares the living stuff out of me…..one of these days yes – I am going to have to nut up and deal with it….however this was not the trip!;)
SOOOOOOO…moral of the story is, I only brought 400 film with me and the latter part of the shoot was a smidge darker than the 400 film could take with the style that I like to shoot.  :)  photo talk bla bla bla…..
I still love them and I hope you do too!:)
undefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefined
FAVE!!!!!
undefinedundefined
OH….and FYI – If when you are on your way home your bag weighs 80 pounds and you pay the additional fee for the overage…..the TSA will leave a nice little love note in your bag that you will find when you start to unpack:)

Saturday, March 15, 2014

What is Reciprocity Failure?

undefined
"Lower Manhattan Glowing" - by Shawn Hoke, via FPP Flickr Pool
Whether you’re using a lower speed film in daylight, trying to maximize your depth of field in a landscape, or just setting up the camera for an exposure at night, sooner or later you’re going to start pushing the limits of your film’s light gathering ability. As light becomes more scarce, the silver halide grains residing in your film will be less uniformly struck by photons, causing a steep drop in density after a few seconds of needed exposure. This exponentially diminishing response to low light levels is more popularly known as a film’s reciprocity failure. Not all films are created equal, and some will respond better than others, but here’s what you can typically expect:
B&W Film - exposures in excess 1-2 seconds will result in reduced density, yielding very thin, if not non-existent shadows.
Color Negative Film - exposures in excess of 20 seconds will result in color-shifting, as dye layers of the film will absorb light unevenly over the prolonged exposure.
Slide Film - exposures in excess of 5 seconds have color shifts similar to color negative. In high saturation films such as Fuji Velvia, this shifting is much more extreme.

"We Saw It Happen" - by Kevin Joes, via FPP Flickr Pool
So how can we avoid the “Effffed!” moment after getting our images developed? Compensation, compensation, compensation! In B&W films, you compensate by adding more exposure time, and developing slightly less time. In color emulsions, you add slightly more time, and apply color filtration to compensate for color shifts. But to what degree to we make these changes? Luckily, chemical engineers and other well trained film professionals have rigorously tested films before bringing them to market. Almost every major film out there gives us a general use data sheet, telling us what working exposures we can expect from a given metered scene. Take, for example, this lovely chart (page 2) for Kodak’s classic B&W film, Tri-X.
Dissecting B&W exposure compensation a little more, why is it necessary to reduce development time if we’re already increasing the exposure time? The simple answer is to save highlights. During that longer exposure, photons hitting the film emulsion in the highlight region will give the silver halides plenty of light. To make sure there’s still some detail in the final image’s highlights, you reduce the development time; this will give the shadows adequate time to develop while taming just how dense the highlights get. In other words, we’re taking a very high contrast exposure and applying a low contrast development to obtain a “normal” negative. For more information and much more on exposure and development, I highly recommend Ansel Adams’ The Negative.
undefined
"Patiently Waiting" - by Jeff Soderquist, via FPP Flickr Pool
If anything here is starting to sound too technical, have no fear. Remember that a vast majority of the pictures you’ll be taking won’t even need to consider reciprocity failure. But if you regularly shoot at night or with a large format camera, however, you may want to get to know your film a little better with a five minute “Da Google” search. A couple other ways to “cheat” reciprocity failure is to shoot with a film stock that has very low reciprocity failure or responds well to color shifting. In the B&W world, the hot film for long exposures the past couple of years has been Fuji Across 100. For exposures 2 minutes or less (that’s right, 2 minutes!), no compensation is needed. For anything after that only needs ½ stop adjustment or 1.5 times the indicated exposure time. For color film shooters a, now harder to find, popular solution was to shoot slower speed tungsten balanced slide film such as Ektachrome 64T for a really long time, as the shifts would lean more towards daylight, no filtering required! You can see a great example below:
undefined
Puerto Madero, Buenos Aires, Argentina - by Rafakoy, via FPP Flickr Pool
So now that you’re in “the know” on reciprocity failure, get out there any time of day and shoot. Stop all the way down in broad daylight, shoot with ridiculously slow film in low light, and even play around with color shifts. Just use that trusty tripod, remember the pros and cons of your film, stay super positive, and have fun! And when you get those tasty film images developed, be sure to head over to the Film Photography Project’s Flickr Group, and post ‘em there too.
Happy shooting and long live film.

Friday, March 14, 2014

CAMERA MOD: Brownie Bullet + Holga = FrankenHolga!

FrankenHolga
"It's ALIVE!!!" FrankenHolga is born.
It all started with a Holga, my first Holga (you always remember your first). When I bought it almost 10 years ago, I had no idea that it would be one of many, nor did I realize that it would go through a transformation into what would become one of my favorite cameras ever.
The first incarnation was the removal of the shutter and lens assembly and the installation of the .0059" pinhole. To distinguish the pinhole version in my bag, I painted the top "safety yellow". It stayed in that configuration for about 8 years. I took some amazing images with it.
But, alas, creative boredom being what it is...
I was admiring a recently acquired Brownie Bullet. I was intrigued. I wanted to use it, but I needed a few more metal take-up reels to make it work. What I really wanted was a 120 back for it. This got me thinking about what I wanted from the Bullet. It was the lens.
I estimated the Holga's focal distance from the lens to the film plane with a ruler and put a mark on the Brownie body. Cutting the Bakelite plastic Bullet down to size with a Dremmel Tool was a very loud and messy process. I had to carve away some of the Holga as well. I secured what was left of the Bullet to the hacked Holga body with black paper tape. I had to tape over the Brownie's periscope eyepiece as well.
I assumed the Bullet's shutter was roughly 1/60th to 1/100th of a second. As a quick and dirty test (instead of potentially wasting an entire roll of 120 film), I prepped some photo paper and exposed some paper negatives, which I contact printed to check for exposure and focus. The relative sharpness of the image and the soft edges amazed me.
The resulting square image was a bit smaller than the standard Holga 6x6 image. The image was so much smaller, in fact, I wondered if I could get 16 images out of the roll. On a trek to a local market, FrankenHolga created a wonderful montage by perfectly connecting all of the images on the roll edge to edge. A FrankenHolgarama.
The addition of a Polaroid back added to the fun, versatility and the name, thus becoming a FrankenHolgaroid.
empty metro car
“empty metro car” - multiple exposures with the FrankenHolga

vancouver shore portrait
“Vancouver shore portrait”


“Nathan and Keith at The Rugby”

I’ve been, needless to say, very pleased with the results of this ongoing experiment. I never expected it to work, let alone become one of my favorites. FrankenHolga continues to amaze and delight me with its unique outlook on the world. Both of its viewfinders are useless, leaving FrankenHolga to determine what it wants to show me. Giving up the control to a camera you trust has been a great release for me. I love the images and the reaction I get from people who see FrankenHolga for the first time.
So get out there and hack up some of those classic cameras gathering dust on your selves. They really would rather be working anyway, right? Just ask them, they'll tell you.
Check out my FrankenHolga set on flickr

365 d30Gregg B. McNeill is a Filmmaker and Photographer currently living in Scotland, on the Isle of Bute. He runs a production company called Big baby Productions Ltd. shooting documentaries, features and music videos.
Gregg's photostream on Flickr.com

Thursday, March 13, 2014

Extraordinary Photos of Animals Posed in Human Situations from the 1910's

These photographs were taken by American photographer Harry Whittier Frees (1879–1953), who dressed his cats, Rags and Fluff, as well as the pets (dogs, pigs, rabbits and birds) of his friends and neighbors, and posed them in human situations with props, often with captions.

Those viewing his photography instantly think there is a trick to it. However, Mr. Frees worked in a time in history when tricks in photography didn't exist. The photographer simply had to wait patiently for the shot he wanted. In Mr. Frees' own words, "These unusual photographs of real animals were made possible only by patient, unfailing kindness on the part of the photographer at all times."

His career in animal photography took off at the turn of the 20th century when his pictures first appeared on novelty postcards and calendars. The March 1, 1937, edition of LIFE magazine reatured an article on Mr. Frees titled, "Speaking of Pictures...These are Harry Frees's Lifework". The article explains that Frees's career as a photographer of dressed animals began at a birthday party in 1906, when a paper party hat was passed around the dinner table and landed on the pet cat's head. Harry took a picture and a career was begun! He took others and sold them to a postcard printer, who clamored for more.

In the preface to "Animal Land on the Air", Harry Whittier Frees describes working with his subjects. "Rabbits are the easiest to photograph in costume, but incapable ot taking many "human" parts. Puppies are tractable when rightly understood, but the kitten is the most versatile animal actor, and possesses the greatest variety of appeal. The pig is the most difficult to deal with, but effective on occasion. The best period of young animal models is a short one, being when they are from six to ten weeks of age. An interesting fact is that a kitten's attention is best held through the sense of sight, while that of a puppy is most influenced by sound, and equally readily distracted by it. The native reasoning powers of young animals are, moreover, quite as pronounced as those of the human species, and relatively far surer."

Frees' animal pictures became more elaborate. His exposures were taken at 1/5th of a second and two-thirds of the negatives had to be discarded. He rented his models from neighbors, breeders, and pet shops and said his work was so nerve-racking that he only photographed three months a year. The rest of the time was spent preparing new props, scenes, and situations.