Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Cornel Lucas: Shooting stars

In 1948, a young photographer named Cornel Lucas was walking between sound stages at Denham Film Studios – home of Alexander Korda’s production company – when he heard his name being called.
“I understand you get on well with female artists?” asked the man who had been looking for him.
Lucas nodded. He had six sisters, he explained, and that had given him an advantage. Why?
“Would you like to photograph Marlene Dietrich tomorrow?”
Lucas was 28. He’d owned a Box Brownie since he was 11, worked in film labs since he was 15 and in the stills department at the film studio since the end of the war, but none of that – nor any of his sisters – had prepared him for Dietrich, who was in need of a photographer because she’d just fired her last. He said yes.
The next day, Lucas prepared a set. He lit it carefully, and arranged some suitcases on which he would ask Dietrich to perch. She arrived wearing a mink cape that had been made for her in Paris to the tune of £10,000, sat patiently, and demanded to see the proofs the following day.
At that second encounter, she took an eyeliner pencil and a huge magnifying glass from her handbag, and marked the proofs with the letter “X” or “O”. The Xs, she explained, were rejects. The Os were to be retouched. Then she shook Lucas’s hand. “Thank you very much, Mr Lucas,” she said. “Join the club.”
undefined
Marlene Dietrich photographed by Cornel Lucas in 1948
The “club” Lucas joined was a dream factory – Britain’s answer to Hollywood. While Clarence Sinclair Bull headed up the stills department at MGM, Lucas was given his own studio at Pinewood (which had merged with Denham), built on the site of an old swimming pool.
Not only did he produce portraits of the stars who came to work there, he could make a younger actor's career, or break it. One of the first things a would-be starlet was asked to do was have a portrait taken by Lucas. A screen test was only part of it; if the stills didn’t turn out well, a contract was out of the question. Lucas went on to become the only stills photographer to be awarded a Bafta, for services to the film industry.
‘I met him when I was 18,” says Susan Travers, who was married to Lucas until his death just over a year ago, at the age of 92. “The Rank Organisation wanted to put me on to contract, so they sent me down to Pinewood for a photographic session. He was very charming, but he didn’t like what I was wearing, so he lent me his sweater, and a coat.” The resulting image – taken in 1957 – is about to be used on the banner advertising an exhibition of Lucas’s work at the National Theatre.
Travers had always wanted to act. Her mother, Linden Travers – with whom Lucas photographed her later, in a beautiful double portrait that looks almost like a reflection – was a well-known actress who had worked with Hitchcock in The Lady Vanishes. (Indeed, Susan Travers later had a small role in a Hitchcock film too, though she’s dismissive of the part she played in Frenzy.)
But in the event she turned down every contract she was offered in 1957 – not just Rank’s, but one from Twentieth Century Fox and others too. She opted for a marriage contract instead, and did a good deal of live television work while bringing up the four children she had with Lucas.
Travers confirms the “ease with women” that Lucas’s experience with his sisters gave him. And it was just as well, since the stars who passed through his studio all had their quirks. Katharine Hepburn refused to wear make-up (she would rub her cheeks with crushed ice instead, to make them glow) and didn’t want any artificial set-ups, so in order to cast some light on the “casual” scene Hepburn had agreed to, Lucas would have to make surreptitious arrangements for one of the electricians in the gantry to shine a beam on her from overhead.
Lauren Bacall, similarly, asked to be photographed in the relaxed environment of her apartment, and wouldn’t allow Lucas to retouch the results. Brigitte Bardot came in to his studio in 1955 – she was young and self-conscious and kept putting her wrist up against her mouth in order to hide her slightly buck teeth. The publicity director, who was watching, laughed and said: “She’s like a sex kitten.” That, according to Lucas, is how the phrase was born.
undefined
Brigitte Bardot photographed by Cornel Lucas in 1955
Diana Dors, on the other hand, was – as Lucas recalled in a book of his work – “a tremendous self-publicist”. She dreamt up her own famous stunt at the Venice Film Festival in 1955, in which she appeared in a gondola in a long coat. She had warned Lucas that he should get himself to the right place at the appointed time, and, assured that her performance would be recorded, she whipped off her coat to reveal a mink bikini. Or at least, she said it was mink. Lucas later found out it was made of rabbit.
Others could be less self-involved. Lucas’s greatest admiration was perhaps reserved for Gregory Peck, who was not only “the most handsome of all the film stars I ever photographed”, but was so kind that when Lucas’s assistant (or “prop man”), Ernie, was dying, Peck visited him in hospital every day that he was in the UK.
David Niven used to make Lucas laugh. Once, when he stopped by the studio, he told a story about his modelling days, when he and Errol Flynn established a syndicate in order to prevent agencies from taking advantage of them. They would each only model certain body parts, so they had to be paid separately. On one occasion, Niven was due to model a pair of trousers and was asked to hold a drink. “Not my forte, old chap,” he said, “I’m left-handed and feel rather awkward. But I do know just the man for the job.” And there was Flynn, on hand to demand his own fee.
When Jack Buchanan came to be photographed, Lucas had a confession to make. This was 1955, but Lucas had already had a close encounter with Buchanan, in 1938. He was 18, and working as a junior technician in the film processing lab.
He was responsible for Buchanan’s film Brewster’s Millions, each reel of which had to be taken off the processing machine at the critical moment. The room was warm, and Lucas became drowsy. Evidently, he fell asleep, because when he woke up he was covered in celluloid, and large chunks of the movie had to be reshot.
undefined
Susan Travers with her mother Linden Travers, photographed in 1961
Whether that persuaded him to keep his eye on the technical side of things from then on, it’s hard to say, but there’s no doubt he became an expert. Lucas worked as a photographer during the war, going on secret night missions with the RAF – none of which he would ever describe to Susan Travers, though he did tell her he once shared a bunk with T E Lawrence.
And when he came to devote himself to portraiture, he “painted with light”, as Travers puts it. Dietrich appreciated straight away that he had identified “the 12 o’clock highlight” she liked so much – the cheekbone-enhancing light from overhead. And even after fashion photographers such as Norman Parkinson in London or Richard Avedon in New York were moving at fast speed with medium-format, he continued to use his 12in x 10in plate camera, a machine the size of a small car.
Lucas pointed out that you could tell how long his sitters had to remain still by observing the amount of ash at the end of their cigarettes.
In 1959, as the studio system was winding down, Lucas set up his own photographic studio in Flood Street, Chelsea. He did more fashion work then, and advertising – but, before long, the Sixties took over, and that era belonged to the likes of David Bailey and Terence Donovan.
It seems odd, perhaps, that Lucas never moved to Hollywood. Travers says he considered it, but when he went to America after the war, he found the portions of food so enormous he couldn’t think of moving there. “I had just come from a country still on terribly strict rationing,” Lucas later recalled, “I found that very offensive.”
In any case, he built a family in Britain. “I spent practically all my life with him,” Travers reflects. The qualities that charmed even his most diva-esque sitters clearly influenced the rest of his life too. “He had a great sense of humour,” she says. “Most arguments ended in laughter.

by: Gaby Wood

Film Portrait Photography by Natalia Abashidze

Natalia Abashidze is a 27 year old artist and photographer based-in Tbilisi, Georgia. She loves shooting film and shoots mostly people portraits. Natalia also owns some of film cameras that we featured her portraits with film cameras here. And today, here are some examples of her work on film photography.










Monday, February 17, 2014

Youth letter: Is it necessary to be worried about Kodak leaving Windsor?

Being a student photographer myself, I know that film photography will never completely fade out. In classes, we still use the “old-school” Kodak Tri-X film that has been very popular with professionals and hobbyists alike.

The film has stood the test of time, starting production in the 1940s. I believe that Kodak could save a lot of money if it cut its products down to what people actually buy.
I know for me personally, I buy Tri-X film, 400-speed film, 200-speed film and nothing else. I believe that Kodak is trying way too hard in order to appeal to other markets that they do not belong in.
The company is involved in such industries as touch-screen sensing technology, graphics and packaging. Kodak is an industrial giant in the production of film, and that’s where I believe they should focus.
As for being worried about Windsor, I am not. I believe that Kodak will downsize but will not completely leave. There are plenty of job opportunities for those living in Windsor around Northern Colorado. We are lucky to be surrounded by huge companies such as HP, AMD, Avago, OtterBox and many others.
There does not seem to be any shortage of jobs for those looking for industrial careers.
Windsor has plenty of the resources it needs to be successful without Kodak to bring in tons of people.

Ryan Arb, Fossil Ridge High School student

 

Sunday, February 16, 2014

Film Photography by Mukadder Gülpınar

Mukadder Gülpınar is an amateur photographer from based-in Istanbul, Turkey. She shoots mostly film with her old camera Canon AE-1. "One of my father's friends gave me this cameme as a gift when he saw I'm interested in analogue," she says. "So I feel proud when I took remarkable photos with it."

Here's a selection of her work:













See more of Mukadder's work on her 500px page.

Pentax K1000 - FPP's 35mm Camera of the Year!

undefined
Update 1/20/2014
This January The FPP donated 15 Pentak K1000 cameras (and over 100 rolls of Kodak film)  to Louise Contino and her Project Wanteete so she can teach photography remotely while in Uganda, Africa January to June 2014. Louise is working with two nonprofit organizations, ICP NYC and the FPP to make it all happen!
Michael Raso hand-picked the K1000 as "the" perfect camera for the job and tested each camera before its long journey.
More info soon on her project. In the meantime, you can help by visiting and donating to Louise's Kickstarter page HERE.
Why is the Pentax K1000 FPP's camera of the year? Read on!
Here at The Film Photography Podcast, listener questions are a big part of what we do. You ask, then we do our super best to get you the answer you seek. For at least one out of every ten of these questions, we’re bound to get a question like, “What’s a good camera for somebody just starting out in film?” or “What 35mm camera should I get?”. Though the choices are plentiful, there is one camera that has quickly made its way to the top of our recommendations list, the Pentax K1000.

"Cowboy Joe" by Michael Raso, Pentax K1000 SE
Hitting the scene in 1976, the Pentax K1000’s intuitive design, sleek form factor, and modest price point captivated photographers world wide. After being in production for over 30 years, and with 3 million+ units sold, the Pentax K1000 has been labeled by many as the sturdy “workhorse” of the 35mm world. But just what is it that makes this camera stand out from all other 35mm SLR’s? Let’s have a look at the specs:
  •     Fully mechanical SLR
  •     TTL metering system, powered by readily available LR44 batteries
  •     Wide range of shutter speeds, 1/1000 - 1sec. and Bulb
  •     ASA Range from 20-3200
  •     Hot shoe with flash sync @ 1/60th sec.
  •     Accepts all Pentax K-mount lenses
undefined
A fine assortment of K-mount lenses to choose from!
Is there anything really ground-breaking here? Absolutely not. But what is there is everything you need to function as a photographer, and not a lick more. The lack of auto-exposure modes and the ease of operation made this the ideal student camera. Even to this day, The University of Findlay (my Alma mater) still has a fleet of these cameras for its incoming film photography students.
undefined
FPP Midwest Meetup attendees Dave Mihaly & Jason Benning
By Michael Raso, Pentax K1000 SE
So how do you know if the Pentax K1000 is the camera for you? If you are: a student, on a budget, a camera junkie with GAS, someone that never has fresh batteries, or just a no frills kind of photographer, the Pentax K1000 is right up your alley. Still need an excuse to try out this bangin’ bargain bin camera? FPP host Michael Raso and regular guest Lauren Bagley love, love, love this camera! Here’s some more on what Mike thinks of his fabulous Pentax K1000SE:


If you’re now on the hunt for a Pentax K1000, have no fear, there are plenty to be had. Just head on over to “the bay”, Craigslist, or even flea market, a used K1000 is bound to turn up. And with prices more reasonable than a dinner and a movie date, you should try one today and see why it’s one of the best selling 35mm SLR’s of all time!
Happy shooting, and long live film.
undefined
"For the Love of Polaroid" by Lauren Bagley, Pentax K1000

Why Shoot Expired Film?  Update!


by Michael Raso
Back in the 1990s the concept of shooting on expired film seemed crazy. You would buy or drink an expired carton of milk? Nuts, right?
The digital photography explosion has pushed traditional film photography out of the spotlight and into the underground, where a rising cult of film shooters grows daily. Many shooters are attempting to steer away from the crisp look of digital and are open to the idea of using expired film to achieve that different, vintage look.
above: Genesis guitarist Steve Hackett on his 2013 Genesis Revisited II Tour (Times Square NYC 25 Sept).
I shot the Steve Hackett image on expired Kodak Tri-X using the point and shoot Olympus Stylus 80 camera. I processed the film in exhausted Kodak D-76. That combined with the slow shutter speed of the camera gave the film it's low contrast "spent" look.

above: FPP Guy Mark Dalzell / below: John Fedele (with his "Road Rage" face. Both shot with the Canon T70 / Tele-Lentar f2.8 135mm lens on "Batch Fried" Kodak Portra 800 (expired 04/2005)
Open to the grain!
With the advent of pockets of communities like this (The Film Photography Project),  Lomography and other companies promoting fun, plastic cameras, the new breed of film shooter seems less rigid and has embraced shooting expired film for the various funky colors and effects it can produce.
So, you ask…why shoot expired film and where can I purchase it?
Both retailers and private shooters alike are literally dumping their refrigerated stock on e-bay as they convert to digital. This is an excellent way for you to save money as well as being able to pick up some film stocks that are no longer produced.

Dedicated Film Fridge

FILM TYPES
Before buying or bidding on expired film, lets talk about film type. Color Print Film (processed in C-41), Color Slide Film (processed in E-6) and BW film (traditional BW processing) are the most common auctions. You will see auctions for instant films and for unique stocks like infrared film. Use “The Google” to look up stocks you might not of heard of before to make sure that processing is still available.
Flickr Kodak Expired Film Promotion

THE BAY
Door # 1
What to look for when buying film on "the bay" ( http://www.ebay.com/ ) are professional photographers that have switched to digital and are cleaning out their fridges & freezers. These auctions are GOLD. Film could be 15+ years old and still great because these guys stored it properly. Most of these films were also “batch tested” by the seller. As I mentioned, these are the best auction for purchasing expired film.
Door #2
The 2nd type of auctions I look for are guys selling bulk CVS, WALGREENS or other off-brand films. Most big pharmacies are liquidating their 35mm film and are selling for well under the $5. per roll sticker price. Most of these films are stored at room temperature so, don't buyer beware if the expiration date is pre-2007.

Door #3
The 3rd type of e-bay seller is the “I don’t know nuthin” guy. These sellers state that they know absolutely nothing about the product and have no idea how it was store or where it came from. This film was most likely stored in basements, attics and sock drawers and probably tortured in high temperatures. Buyers beware!
Regardless of what type of auction, don’t be afraid to ask the seller questions and/or try to find how the film was stored. If your into weird or funky film and want to take a chance on the “Type 3” e-bay seller, you might find that tortured film yields a desired effect!
The Final Door
The final door also happens to be The Best Door!  Why? This is the door to the FPP Store where I've been compiling lots of expired film just for you! Not only do you get film batch-tested by yours truly, but you are also helping support the Film Photography Podcast by making this purchase! So, sashay over to the FPP Store to check out the current inventory! Expired 35mm (and fresh-dated) film HERE.

Ducky Daddles / Woodland Lake

undefined
Above: The many moods of expired film! See my Flickr Expired Set HERE (or the slide show below!)
Have fun shooting film and feel free to drop me a line to tell me about your shooting experiences!
Originally published July 27, 2011 / Revised November 16, 2012 and September 26, 2013

Saturday, February 15, 2014

Exhibit focuses on black and white photography

Every-One-Exhibition-1
By Pinehas Nakaziko 

WINDHOEK
- Namibian photographer Tony Figueira, has announced that the exhibition  Every one hundredth of a second exhibition will focus mainly on black and white photography.
Figueira made the announcement at the media launch of the exhibition on Tuesday at Studio 77 saying this will give the taste and show the reality of the images taken during the late eighties and early nineties. Every one hundredth of a second which opens next Friday until March 19, is a photographic exhibition by John Liebenberg and Tony Figueira, and it will be exhibited at Omba Gallery on February 21 with the opening remarks by Professor Andre du Pisani.  In the exhibition, arranged by Omba Gallery’s Shareen Thude, and sponsored by the National Arts Council of Namibia (NACN), photographers John Liebenberg and Tony Figueira create, through a selection of 20 images each, a personal account of some special photographic moments of events in Namibia, Angola and South Africa. The images cover a wide variety of topics with emphasis on the liberation struggle in Namibia that led to independence on March 21, 1990.
This exhibition, Every one hundredth of a second, is about special moments in both the photographers’ lives, and in the role that photography played in documenting a process that affected three countries. In addition the exhibition is about the essence of photography, and in particular film photography as viewed from, and in contrast to, today’s digital world. It is a stark reminder of what it was like to photograph without digital immediacy, and relying only on light meters and light judgements in situations often insecure, challenging or uncertain. Photography is always around us, and Every one hundredth of a second, there is a photographic moment, an opportunity to capture the world we live in. For both photographers this exhibition is a great way to go back in time, pick out a handful of images and collaborate in a small but uniquely powerful display of black and white photography about the world we lived in and should never forget.
John Liebenberg was introduced to Namibia in 1976 when, together with his fellow conscripts, was sent to Ondangwa Air-force base near the border with Angola. He later returned to Namibia and in 1985 was appointed photographer for the Namibian newspaper, then a brand new newspaper challenging the apartheid status quo and promoting the independence of Namibia. Following independence his family moved to Johannesburg, from where he covered the Angolan civil war as freelancer for Reuters. He later joined Media 24 magazines mostly working for Drum. He is an established news photographer whose work has been exhibited in Africa and Europe. His Namibian photographic collection documenting Swapo’s war of Liberation and the South African occupation is widely used by historians, researchers and film makers.
After graduating from Rhodes University, Angolan-born Tony Figueira’s passion for documentary photography and photojournalism saw him cover a wide variety of themes involving people and processes. The liberation struggle and Namibia’s road to independence became a key focus, and during the implementation of United Nations Resolution 435, Tony was commissioned by the United Nations to document the process. Freelance journalism and photography led to stringing for several local and international media organisations including Voice of America (VOA), Radio TSF (Lisbon), Gemini Agency (London), The Rand Daily Mail and the Weekly Mail (Johannesburg). Throughout the years, Tony has exhibited widely in Namibia and internationally. In 2004 he started Studio 77, a commercial photographic, printing and design studio in Windhoek.

Friday, February 14, 2014

Film Is King



Noted photographer still prefers film


Posted: Thursday, February 13, 2014 2:45 pm
Novice lessons at the Rockaway Twp. Library
ROCKAWAY TWP. – Things were coming into focus Saturday at the Rockaway Township Public Library.
The library hosted a free course in photography, known as “Getting to Know Your Digital Camera,” hosted and taught by professional New Jersey photographer Walter Choroszewski.
During the class, Choroszewski taught the basics of photography, a brief history on the subject, the science behind the techniques and art form, and the difference between regular film and digital.
Choroszewski also gave tips on buying the best digital camera, how to use certain types properly, and applying it in today’s growing digital world.
The photographer explained his opinion on whether film or digital was better. Throughout his photography career for over 30 years, Choroszewski prefers film.
“Film is quality, but digital is convenience,” said Choroszewski.
“If I wanted the best possible picture, I would shoot film. We’re a lot better where we are now with digital, but in the end, film is superior.”
Though originally from northeastern Pennsylvania, Choroszewski is known for his photos that celebrate the beauty of the Garden State. His first big breakthrough came in 1981 when he published a photo essay on the state, “New Jersey, A Scenic Discovery.”
The success of Choroszewski’s works established his signature photographic identity and made him the primary photographer of the N.J. state tourism campaigns, “New Jersey & You… Perfect Together,” throughout the 1980s and 1990s.
Choroszewski is also an accomplished graphic designer and videographer and owns Aesthetic Press Inc., with his wife Susan, who lives and works with him in Somerset County. Aesthetic Press Inc. publishes regional books and calendars that continue to glorify the state’s landscape.
In his career over the past three decades, Choroszewski has received many awards and has also given classes on photography as he did at the township library.
Staff said they were pleased to have someone of his expertise come to their facilities.
“Choroszewski was very informative on the history [of photography] and very hands on,” said reference librarian and event organizer Kyle Craig.
“It’s nice that we can offer this program for free to the community.”
Even the attending crowd of photo enthusiasts, numbering to about 30 people, was excited and pleased to hear what Choroszewski had to offer the basics of film and digital photography.
“He taught it so that the dumbest of us could understand,” said White Meadow Lake resident J.E. Alston-Johnson.
Others felt the same way.
“It was great,” said Meri Tango, another White Meadow Lake resident.
“Choroszewski was very informative. I was set to sell my 35mm camera, but now I’m gonna keep it. The potential for best pictures is still there.”
After the class, people departed with new knowledge on photography, hoping to apply it themselves in today’s age of picture taking.
But Choroszewski reminds everyone that although digital is a great, film will always better.
“When quality is needed, film is needed,” said Chorozewski.
“Film is king.”

Thursday, February 13, 2014

Filtering it All Out


This column is dedicated to all those who, like our friend M, say they look at this stuff every week and don't understand a word of it. And also to those, like our super-intelligent pal A, who says: ''When I see the word 'pixel' I stop reading.''
He stops at pixel? Really? He never gets up to ISO sensitivity, RAW versus jpeg, phase and contrast detect auto focus and bokeh - not to mention the anti-aliasing filter, as we do in the review of the Pentax today. We are hurt. We've spent 10 years coming to grips with the technical jargon of digital imaging and find we are writing for a tiny cohort of nerds and geeks who want to know about zoom ratios and the burst mode speed and how to improve the dynamic range of the photograph's tones.
Well, there's no point in sulking. What does a person need to know in order to take photographs? If you can find the on-off switch and the shutter release then you are pretty much ready to go. After all, in 1954, Virginia Schau won the Pulitzer Prize for Photography with a box Brownie.
Presumably, Virginia didn't think about the physics and chemistry involved in making, exposing and developing the film, so why should you?
The difference between Virginia's interaction with a film Brownie and yours with a digital camera is that you have more choices. More choices means more decisions, which involves having information on which to make them. And information and decisions is what most people want to avoid.
When Virginia put the film in the camera she had set the ISO sensitivity automatically (it was ASA in her day - American Standards Association - now it is International Organisation of Standards); she had also decided in advance whether it would be black and white or colour; the image resolution was set by the size and dispersal of the silver crystals in the film. She only had to see the photo opportunity, frame the picture in her little reflex viewfinder and press the button. Just like a smartphone, you might say.
Here's the good news: your camera, no matter how complicated it may appear to be, can be set up to work like a box camera. The important thing is to make sure that when it has been optimised for point and shoot, the little knobs and dials must never be touched again. That is, except for one vital, easy-to-understand control that we will come to in due course.

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Has Film Photography Gone the Way of the Dinosaur?

Should we keep shooting slide film?  Photo Cananda's Dale Wilson argues why we shouldn't forget this form of photography.
In a rather ironic twist of circumstance, a friend recently forwarded me a photo of his latest camera purchase. I had to look several times to ensure this indeed was what I thought—a real camera.   You know, something made from metal and not plastic, same goes for the lenses, and the same kind of device that shot, heaven forbid, some kind of recording media made from cellulose.
The irony rested in the fact that just at the moment I received his e-mail, I was trying to locate E-6 chemical kits for my in-house processor, without success I might add. Next on my agenda was to locate a retail outlet that could process my slide film. I was thinking that since I live in the largest urban centre east of Quebec City, surely there would be a lab in the city still processing E6. My one time favourite dip-and-dunk lab now ships film processing off with an advertised turn-around time of four weeks! The next largest lab also ships the film outside for a two-week turn around. I then went to a couple of labs in New Brunswick—same thing. Goodness, even the largest retail outlet in Toronto ships E6 processing to their subsidiary store in Calgary.
While I subscribe to the notion that we can’t stop progress, I also wish we could embrace the past for just a while longer. There are reasons why we should still be shooting slide film. Please allow me to offer a few.
1.    Enjoyment—There is something different about the psyche of the film photographer. Generally we were more slow and methodical in our approach. We studied the viewfinder carefully and only released the shutter when we were quite certain we had the composition that best fit the reason in the first place. Every time we released the shutter, the camera went ka-ching and that was the sound of 50 cents, and that forced the photographer to be aware. That forced awareness made us more in tune with our surroundings and environment, and as a consequence, we enjoyed those surroundings more.  From my experience, when cost is not a consideration, I shoot many, many more frames per day than I would with film.
2.    Learning Experience—Yes, our modern DSLRs most often have a “M” on the mode dial. However, I wonder how many beginners actually use the manual mode? Those of us from the old school didn’t have a choice, we might have had an exposure indicator in the viewfinder, but for all intents and purposes the camera was shot in manual mode. Somewhere in our photo vest there was probably a spot meter, that necessary pain-in-the-butt device that told us what a proper exposure should be. However, over time, most photographers would be able to discern a proper exposure just with the naked eye.  In other words, we taught ourselves how to “see the light.”
3.    Taking Command—Once we learned how to see the light, we learned how to take command of the camera. We knew that a correct exposure of f/16 and 1/125 of a second was the same correct exposure as f/8 at 1/500 of a second. Correct exposure was the assurance we would see a proper appearing piece of film once processed; the right exposure was the ability to know the interaction between the shutter and lens iris to create effect. When we bracketed exposure, it was more often for effect than for exposure. Today, I fear, many beginning photographers never give themselves the opportunity to truly understand how the most basic theories of light and camera interaction.
4.    Gratification—By being forced to slow down and having learned how to take command of the camera, film photographers probably gravitated to roll film or sheet film. There is something about looking at the mirror image on the ground glass of a view camera. The photographer becomes part of the camera by controlling its movements and “imagining” how that final picture will appear. We are mentally running through a check list to ensure the “right exposure”—after all, we only have one opportunity before we have to remove the film holder and start over. Consequently, when that perfect transparency or negative emerges from the chemical bath,  there is a sense of fulfillment that I have yet to experience despite having captured many, many thousands more digital images than I have on film. Perhaps it is the anticipation that comes with having to wait for the results that enhance that sense of gratification?
5.    Appreciation—Most importantly, film photography provides a much better appreciation of the advances in technology that brought us matrix metering, autofocus and digital capture. I would never subscribe to the notion that film is better than digital, or vice versa, as that is simply an argument without merit. However, I will also state that, for me, shooting film was far and away more enjoyable than digital capture in the overall process.  At the same time, digital capture, I suspect, will allow me to live a longer life to enjoy the pursuit of photography due to the elimination of anxiety attacks that come with waiting for the film to be processed.
With the above in mind, I am hoping someone can write Photo Life and tell us where we might be able to purchase E6 chemistry kits. After all, nostalgia can keep my friend and I doing it, as opposed to telling war stories about the good old days.
Did I ever tell you the time that…?
This article was first published on the website of Photo Life Canada's guide to everything photo.

Monday, February 10, 2014

Film Scanning

Scanning 120 film

Edward Giarusso , Feb 08, 2014; 07:07 p.m.
Years ago I scanned many of my slides to Kodak CD. What a wonderful process. This past week I sent out 40 frames of 120 (30 landscape slides/10 people negatives) I shot years ago and they all suck. The lab did enhanced scanning and the quality for resolution is just OK but they are all flat. The highlights are all blown out to be almost a gray sky for the slides. Researching scanning topics on this site does not address my concerns. Some of the better are 5/6 years old. So my question is where do I go from here. I want to shoot landscapes on my Rollei film camera and scan the good frames. Should I pop the money for a Coolscan or is there a lab that can help me out. Very much appreciate your kind response.

Responses

Karim Ghantous , Feb 08, 2014; 10:09 p.m.
Edward, perhaps you don't need a Coolscan. There are two very good options at this time. One is the Plustek OpticFilm 120:
http://www.filmscanner.info/en/PlustekOpticFilm120.html [Edit: after fully reading the review, I cannot recommend this scanner.]
Another option would be a good flatbed scanner such as the Epson V750 Pro:
http://www.filmscanner.info/en/EpsonPerfectionV750Pro.html
Read this forum post on the V700 for an interesting perspective:
http://photo.net/film-and-processing-forum/00Zdeb
Unfortunately I have not used any of these scanners. Not yet, anyway. :-)
David Henderson , Feb 08, 2014; 10:48 p.m.
Couple of points for the moment.
First, in order to give good advice on what sort of scanning/scanner might be required for your purpose depends on knowing what your purpose is for the scans. For example if you're intending to produce large prints to hang on a wall then you need a different sort of scan than if you're just planning to display your images on a screen-based application such as a website.
Second it is quite usual for scans- even good ones-to require some work in an image editor before they are ready for their intended usage. Some sources work harder than others to match the colour and contrast of the original, but as long as the data is all there its generally not such a big deal if the colours are a little flat. But it is a big deal if they have lost significant data that was in in your originals as you won't be able to put it back. I'd consider it unusual for scans to be both flat and with blown highlights as you infer.
Third there are certainly scanning services that can produce a good scan for whatever purposes you envisage, Whether you should buy a scanner or not is IMO more a function of how many you want to scan rather than being necessary to produce respectable quality.
Alan Klein , Feb 08, 2014; 11:38 p.m.
Edward: I shoot 120 color film and scan at home with an Epson V600 flat bed scanner. The Epson V750 mentioned above or Epson V700 is even better). Most scans come out somewhat flat and do require adjustments in post processing. I'd say my scanner is faily decent for internet posts and prints under 20", maybe less. http://www.flickr.com/photos/alanklein2000/sets/72157625476289859/
I haven't seen my scanner blow the highlights of film if I scan "flat" with no adjustments during the scan where the highlights were not blown on the film. However, I have blown highlights when using the scanner to auto adjust the light levels during the scan. Maybe that's what this particular lab did.
Why don't you post a couple of the photos you had scanned so we can see what they look like.
Leszek Vogt , Feb 09, 2014; 12:56 a.m.
If you're looking for (6x6) "good enough" then V750/700 will deliver. Many of us were disappointed with the Plustek 120/35...to be polite. It was hyped all along...and unable to deliver. Many of us have sizable archives and some would pay even $500 more (I know I would) for better DR and be able to get a crisp scan....in a timely manner.
Essentially, and unless you go to drum quality, the Minolta or Nikon scanners are no longer supported....so any sort of service will be uber expensive or nonexistent.
Frankly, you can do a digi copy with P&S or DSLR for web use or you can have it done by more reliable lab....and get high quality scans done when you wish to enlarge your image/es.
Les
neil poulsen , Feb 09, 2014; 12:58 a.m.
Here are the last couple of paragraphs from the above linked review. Check the last sentence:
"The Plustek OpticFilm 120 does not have many competitors on the film scanner market. The extremely fast film scanners Nikon Super Coolscan 9000ED or Hasselblad Flextight X1/X5 play in a different league both in terms of price and in terms of quality. The Reflecta MF5000 is cheapter and much faster than the Plustek OpticFilm 120 and delivers a similar image quality, however, in a lower resolution. Flatbed scaner like the Epson Perfection V750Pro don't achieve the image quality of the Plustek.
"Since we and lots of our customers had many problems with the Plustek OpticFilm 120, we have taken that scanner out of our assortment."
Anthony Oresteen , Feb 09, 2014; 11:04 a.m.
Humm. Here's a review of the Plustek Opticfilm 120 scanner that gives it high marks:
(link)
E. Short , Feb 09, 2014; 05:57 p.m.
Use a different lab.