Thursday, August 7, 2014

Building a Mobile Darkroom – A New Chapter for 2014

I am super excited to start a new journey going into 2014.  I just acquired a Sprinter 2500 Van to sculpt and shape into my mobile darkroom and all things analog photography.  My initial plans are to just use the van on the road for a while and determine how I really want to customize it for my work.  I initially plan to process large and medium format E-6 with my Jobo, do wetplate, as well as black and white positives and alt prints such as Van Dykes and Salt. Depending on where the journey takes me, I could do some enlargement work as well.
Sprinter InsideThe inside is currently a blank slate and I plan to update the site here with new photos and info as I start designing and building things out.  With the Sprinter being so tall I can nearly stand up inside the van.  This is a huge advantage over normal cargo vans.
I am currently researching rooftop A/C-Heating options and roof rack systems so I can build a platform on the top.  My plan is to leverage the rack for the height factor to get unique perspectives, otherwise not possible.  I also found some very reasonable options to add solar power too.  With it being a diesel turbo I have endless options for power inside the van.  This is going to be an incredibly fun project and I look forward to sharing my new discoveries.
At this point I am currently thinking I will focus mostly on 4×5 and 8×10 in 2014 with a strong orientation on E-6 slides and for black and white, positive prints.  As many of your know my focus areas are architecture, floral still life, and nature.  I am in the process of outlining my projects for 2014 right now, so the tools and medium will be settled after I get the work confirmed.
If you have any questions or comments, I am always glad to help.
Tim Layton
 

About Tim Layton

Tim Layton is a Missouri based nature and still life fine art photographer specializing in creating artist original darkroom prints.

Wednesday, August 6, 2014

The best camera in the world! Pentax full frame MZ-3
By Aivaras Sidla
1
I decided to write, because of three main reasons:
A)    I really enjoy your site and would like to be a part of creating community rather than only visitor.
B)   I’m big fan of Pentax MZ-3 / MZ-5N cameras, and this article is my “thanks” to Pentax.
C)    As film shooter I want to promote film.
I’ll try to concentrate on user view of camera and lenses of the system and let readers know what could be achieved with it and with various film. Hope this will create more interest to use Pentax film cameras and push people to shoot more film. Sorry to inform, but report will be quite personal, contains too much photos and language will not be fluent.
I’m hobbyist photographer from Lithuania. My photography illness started in 2012. I started to shoot digital and by accident I stumbled into film photography – found unused film camera in my office and decided to try it. Then I hooked on film and I can’t let it down since then. Digital camera is used only about 30%, when there is not enough light for film, or when I’m in the mood for digital.
My history of film cameras started from Pentax MZ-30 (called ZX-30 in US) and after tests and changes of equipment, researches, purchases and sales I found which film camera is closest to perfect for me – Pentax MZ-3. MZ-3 is enthusiast camera close to top of the range in Pentax MZ line. Camera has very specific balance of simplicity and automation and this is main point in selecting it. Pentax tried to get back to traditional camera design but they put some modern features in it. In this article I do mention MZ-5n, part of shots are taken with it. This camera is very close to MZ-3. MZ-3 has higher top shutter speed – 4000 vs. 2000 in MZ-5n, but MZ-5n has 2s slowest shutter speed on dial vs. 1 s in MZ-3. There are none any more differences between those cameras that I know. To me they are the same, MZ-3 has advantage being faster;  I use both of them.
CONTROLS
3
MZ-3 has to be used with lenses that have physical aperture rings, aperture is controlled with ring on the lens, and shutter speed is controlled by dial on top. Shutter dial has position “A” for Aperture priority, and with lenses that has “A” on aperture dial, camera can be used in shutter priority, or with both controls on “A” it is fully automatic. Simple as that. Below shutter speed dial is metering control switch – there are options of multi segment metering, center weighted and spot metering.Top left of camera contains exposure compensation dial. Below it is drive selector, with single frame, continuous shooting, timer and several options of bracketing.
Slanted panel, situated below top display contains exposure lock button. Main controls of camera are very intuitive, logically laid, fluent in use and everything could be controlled without taking camera from the eye. Controls of camera are very important issue for me, and MZ-3 has one of most confortable solutions. By the way – I think that creators of todays hot Fuji X-T1 had a good place to get some inspiration for controls.
VIEWFINDER
Viewfinder has 92% coverage with 0.8X magnification, has diopter correction and decent eye point – I wear glasses and that is important for me. There is display of main data in right side of finder with good visibility in good and poor light. Mate screen is suitable for manual focusing even without focus confirmation.
BODY AND DESIGN
2
Body is made from plastic and has metal lens mount. I see that some call it flimsy and low quality, but for me it feels solid and reliable. It’s in line to fuji x100, X-E1 cameras that I owned, maybe it has even more solid feel. It weights 410 grams without battery. Body is compact, but with front integral grip and right curvatures in back cover it is very comfortable for my medium size hands.
Camera looks and feels in hand as proper camera should look and feel. Its great. Its traditional but not too old school.
AUTOFOCUS AND MANUAL FOCUS
Autofocus is screw drive, so it’s noisy. It’s quite fast with 43 mm and 50mm lenses and slow with 77mm. It’s quite accurate in normal light, usually confuses in backlight situation. I have no experience with fast AF cameras, so for me AF performance is decent and after using MF cameras, even existence of AF is very good thing.
For manual focusing mate screen is enough, after some practice. Additionally camera has visual (green dot in viewfinder) and sound confirmation.
METERING
As I mentioned previously, camera has 3 types of metering – multi segment, center weighted and spot metering.  I don’t use center weighted metering, so can’t comment on that.  Multi segment metering works good, I use it for less contrast scenes, and hadn’t any issues with it. According to manual it even senses and compensates metering for backlight scenes, but I haven’t tried. Spot metering is great function in this camera; I use it a lot. It’s great that I am able to switch between multi segment metering and spot metering with my eye on viewfinder.
OTHER / SPECIAL FEATURES
Panorama mode – there is a switch close to viewfinder that lets curtains on film in upper and lower sections of view. Then view and picture becomes wide. But is happened at the price of smaller frame – this function is similar to cropping. I use it rarely.
Multi area AF – autofocus can work with single center area (Spot focusing) or 3 points automatic focusing. I use only spot focusing.
DX coding – camera takes DX code from film canister and sets ISO automatically for each film. It prevent from stupid mistake to forget change ISO according to film used. There is option for setting ISO manually.
Auto rewind – camera prepares new film by winding several frames on spool, after loading of new film, winds film after each shot automatically and rewinds it automatically after film roll is finished (I receive strange looks when my camera begins whining when rewinding film).  I like auto film advancing, it lets concentrate on scene and prevent movement of camera which happens when manually advancing film.  Catch in focus feature – when using non AF lenses and dedicated remote cable, camera could be set to shoot automatically when subject comes into focus.  This is convenient in some cases. Build in flash  - used in once, so don’t have experience with it. Data back  - most MZ-3’s comes with data back. Date and time can be printed in each photo. Never used it.
CRITISISM 
There are several aspects that could be better in this camera, but issues are not big. Anyway I prefer to write about them:
Panorama mode – there are 2 problems. First – who needs it? :) Second – more important – if there is backlight in scene, then panorama “curtains” cause bad flare effects. AE lock button – its small, recessed and it hard to find without looking.
There is no mirror lock up feature. I haven’t experienced problems with that, as vibrations are well dampened, but still.
MAIN PROBLEMS
There are several common problems with MZ-3 and MZ-5n:
One is build-in flash spring holder. It breaks and flash doesn’t hold open, It has to be kept raised manually. One of my cameras is experiencing this problem, but for me its not big deal as I don’t use flash. It doesn’t matter when flash is retracted. This problem is easily solved by fixing spring holding pin (with glue).
Second is mirror motor drive gear. Its made from plastic and it breaks eventually. Pentax has solution for that – they produced motor with metal gear and put it MZ-3 limited models and some later models. This motor still can be bought new (approx. 30USD) and could be replaced.
LENS MOUNT
This is where we are coming close to interesting part. Body supports Kaf2, Kaf, Ka, K – mount lenses. Plenty of lenses are available as new or used options. It’s possible to get good quality lenses for reasonable prices or go for top of the range (and quite expensive) Limited’s. More on lenses – later. There is one limiting factor – lenses must have aperture rings, there is no option to control aperture from camera. Worth mentioning Pentax has wide array of legacy lens accessories, providing endless creative possibilities; there are macro add-on lenses for standard lens, macro helicoids, tele converters, even AF adapter that enables AF on some non AF lenses.  I don’t have lots experience here as trying to be as simple as possible. Use only Asahi close up filter Nr. 1 for closer focusing.
To sum all thoughts about camera, the essence not details above, I feel several great things about it:
-       It begs to be used. Starting from look of the camera, feel in the hands, continuing with feel and logic of controls to operational sounds and finishing with results. It inspires to go out (or stay in) and shoot.
-       It disappears when I’m using it. Looks like it’s me and the scene.
LENSES
I shoot with primes most often. My favorite focal length is around 50mm, sometimes I go for short tele range up to 100mm and I’m big fan of shallow depth of field. Pentax provides exiting options in this area and I will go trough those I own and love to use. I like fact, that Pentax managed to keep their prime lenses extremely light, compact and to keep small filter diameter (49mm in this case) – its important for me that all lenses I use has same filter diameter, It helps to save weight and expenditures for filters.
SMC Pentax-FA 50mm F1.4
Good, predictable, balanced standard lens. A little soft wide open (rarely use it at F1.4), reasonably sharp from F2. Smooth bokeh, nine aperture blades provide non distracting highlights. It gives pictures on warm side and has old lens character (and that’s good).
Lens is quite compact, light despite amount of glass used, its made from plastic. Aesthetically this lens sucks with its horrible design and flimsy aperture ring and small manual focus ring, but from compactness side, from picture quality side and from cost side it delivers with excess. Lens is quite cheep both new and used. I would recommend it to 50mm shooter as universal lens. It my first AF 50mm  lens and I use it till this day, but its least used from 50mm lens range as its too much “in the middle”, not too “perfect”, but character is not pronounced enough. Everything about pictures from this lens fits into word “smoth”, therefore I use it when I want same feel in my pictures.
 Pentax MZ-5n, SMC Pentax-FA 50mm F1.4, Kodak Ektar 100
14
-
 Pentax MZ-5n, SMC Pentax-FA 50mm F1.4, Fujifilm Superia 200
15
-
Pentax MZ-5n, SMC Pentax-FA 50mm F1.4, Kodak Portra 400
16
-
Pentax MZ-5n, SMC Pentax-FA 50mm F1.4, Kodak Portra 160
17
-
Pentax MZ-5n, SMC Pentax-FA 50mm F1.4, Kodak BW400CN Professional
19
-
 Pentax MZ-5n, SMC Pentax-FA 50mm F1.4, Kodak Portra 400
20
-
Pentax MZ-5n, SMC Pentax-FA 50mm F1.4, Kodak BW400CN Professional
22
-
 Pentax MZ-5n, SMC Pentax-FA 50mm F1.4, Fujifilm Superia 200
21
SMC Pentax-FA 43mm F1.9 Limited
This one is special. Special starting from odd focal length – 43mm. I adapted to it and like fact that could include a little bit more of context into pictures.  It’s very compact and light, build quality is top. It’s real pleasure to handle this lens. Lens is sharp from wide open, bokeh is quite smooth, but highlights could be strange and distracting in some cases. Pictures from this lens is more on “modern”, “perfect” side. It’s my most used lens today. No lens is perfect, but excess perfectness in pictures and rare distracting highlights are compensated by feel of quality, sharpness, focal range and compactness of lens.
Pentax MZ-3, SMC Pentax-FA 43mm F1.9, Fujifilm Superia 200
-5
-
Pentax MZ-3, SMC Pentax-FA 43mm F1.9, Fujifilm Superia 200
6
-
Pentax MZ-3, SMC Pentax-FA 43mm F1.9, Kodak Portra 160
-7
-
Pentax MZ-3, SMC Pentax-FA 43mm F1.9, Fujifilm Superia 400
8
-
Pentax MZ-3, SMC Pentax-FA 43mm F1.9, Fujifilm Superia 200
9
-
 Pentax MZ-3, SMC Pentax-FA 43mm F1.9, Fujifilm Superia 200
10
 SMC Pentax-FA 77mm F1.8 Limited
Again, typical to Pentax Limited’s odd focal range. Compact, high quality build, integrated lens hood, sharp, smooth bokeh, warm colors. Only good words for this lens.
It focuses slightly slower than 50mm or 43mm, but I suppose this is related to longer focal range.
Pentax MZ-5n, SMC Pentax-FA 77mm F1.8, Fujifilm Superia 200
12
-
Pentax MZ-3, SMC Pentax-FA 77mm F1.8, Fujifilm Superia 200
77 superia naujas
SMC Pentax-F 50mm F1.7 Limited
Latest addition to my lens stable. It’s very special by way how it renders picture and what colors it gives. There are two words that describe pictures from this lens  - surreal and psychedelic. :) I suppose this could be seen in photos. Lens is compact, light, sharp from wide open. Bokeh is… I don’t know how to describe it… its painted maybe? I like handling and physical feel better than FA 50mm F1.4. And its way cheaper in used lens market too. But not everybody would be fond of this lens strongly pronounced character.  Pictures has this “old school” look.
 Pentax MZ-5n, SMC Pentax-F 50mm F1.7, Fujifilm Superia 200
24
-
Pentax MZ-5n, SMC Pentax-F 50mm F1.7, Fujifilm Superia 200
25
-
Pentax MZ-5n, SMC Pentax-F 50mm F1.7, Fujifilm Superia 200
26
-
Pentax MZ-5n, SMC Pentax-F 50mm F1.7, Fujifilm Superia 200
27
-
 Pentax MZ-5n, SMC Pentax-F 50mm F1.7 + Asahi close up filter Nr.1, Kodak Ektar 100
29
-
Pentax MZ-5n, SMC Pentax-F 50mm F1.7, Fujifilm Superia 200
28

And… that’s it.
Steve and Brandon – thanks for keeping awesome site and thanks for publishing this article, or even considering (in case it wont be published :)).
Readers – thank you for reading and looking.
More pictures could be found here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/aiwalit/
More about gear setup I use could be found here (only digital camera has changed): http://www.japancamerahunter.com/2014/02/bag-792-aivaras/
Best regards,
Aivaras

If You Leave


by james de leon
by james de leon

Want to post your images for the whole world to see?  Try "If you leave", a photography site by Photographers, for Photographers.  

Submissions for the IYL Showcase 2014 are now officially open!The deadline for entries is July 8th 2014 and entry is limited to 10 images per photographer. IYL focusses on an individual image rather than a series or a body of work, so select your strongest work and submit through flickr and email..
Flickr (flickr.com/groups/if-you-leave)Email (showcase_2014@if-you-leave.com)We also launched a Kickstarter to help fund the exhibition..http://kck.st/1hOmPxdGood Luck!(image by Cody Cobb)
Submissions for the IYL Showcase 2014 are now officially open!

The deadline for entries is July 8th 2014 and entry is limited to 10 images per photographer. IYL focusses on an individual image rather than a series or a body of work, so select your strongest work and submit through flickr and email..
These are some of the images I liked, why not add some of your own?!

by nicolas colemonts
by nicolas colemonts


by esben bøg jensen
by esben bøg jensen

by mònica dofa
by mònica dofa
thursday, 4th july, 2013
by marat safin
by marat safin

Bending the Light’ Premiere at the Traverse City Film Festival

Bending the Light was commissioned by the photography company Canon to mark their production of more than 90 million lenses. Apted had creative control over the documentary, which included interviews with workers from Canon’s Utsunomiya factory in Japan and acclaimed photographers and cinematographers. The filming—which took place in Japan, London, Egypt, and the United States—only took 15 days, but the editing process took over six months.
MyNorth’s Adrienne Roberts sat down with director Michael Apted to learn more about what he learned from making the documentary and what came out of it that he didn’t expect.

Did you go in with any preconceived notions about the documentary and have your opinions changed by the end?
No. With the Up series, it was more of a cultural thing. When we started doing that, it was all based on a very strict class system. After we had been working on that for 20 years, we began to realize that that wasn’t true anymore. So in some ways we had to adjust our thinking. Not all of it, but a lot of it subconsciously, like the fact that those class-rooted things hang around forever but they aren’t necessarily instructive. But with this, no. This was a difficult film to put together but the central idea of it never changed.
Why was it difficult to put together?
I had a lot of material to work with. It took me forever to figure out what order to put it in. Sometimes I mixed two of [the interviews] up and sometimes I just stuck with one person. Then if I could do strong linkage between the Westen photographer and the Japanese [lens factory worker], I would do that because I wanted to weave [those storylines] together. It took a lot of trial and error. You can’t even imagine how many efforts I had. At the end, just with any film, you have to stop. That was the difficulty of the film, not the idea. It was figuring out what was the most potent way the film together so you got some sense of a journey. You [wanted to make sure you] weren’t repeating yourself or you weren’t showing two people that were very much alike.
How long did it take you to make this documentary?
Well, the shooting was ludicrous! I shot for 15 days. The post [production] took forever. The post probably took the best part of six months to do. It was totally unbalanced, in a sense. No one really knew what it was going to be. They knew what the substance was but they didn’t know if it was going to be a 20-minute film, a 30-minute film, and then it was “Oh no! It’s going to be a 60-minute film!” That kept changing and that’s what made post-production so difficult.
What inspired you to make this documentary?
I’m so involved in the visual arts with the job I do and I was very interested on a fairly basic, technical level how photos were made. I’m always interested in what still-photographers have to say for themselves. I’m sure it’s a great gift that they have—to have a good eye. There’s a difference between an ordinary photograph and a great photograph, and it isn’t necessarily very much but it’s something you can spot. It’s sounded like a fun thing to do—to spend some time with some photographers, watching and filming them work. The subject appealed to me and [Canon] didn’t want it to be a commercial. They meant what they said about that, which was a bit of a relief.
Is there something you personally took away from this documentary that you weren’t expecting?
I learned new ways of expressing things, I suppose. The line that Stephen Goldblatt [an Academy-award winning cinematographer] had, “A great photographer sees something that no one else sees”—I loved that. Watching people work is huge information for me. My job is just being with people. I can’t necessarily define what I pick up from it but I’m so curious to see still photographers direct their scenes. Their job isn’t simple.
Watch the trailer for Bending the Light here.

More Traverse City Film Festival

Tuesday, August 5, 2014

2014 PHOTOBOOK AWARDS

Paris Photo and Aperture Foundation are calling for entries for 2014 PhotoBook Awards. Thirty-five shortlisted entries in total will be exhibited and the award winners will be announced at Paris Photo on 13-16 November 2014.

Closing Date

12 September 2014

Categories

First PhotoBook, Photography Catalogue of the Year and PhotoBook of the Year

Prizes

The winner of the First PhotoBook prize wins $10,000.

Entry Fee

Entry fee is between $30-$60

Entry Requirements

Books can feature one or more photographer or artist and needs to be produced in physical form. To enter the First PhotoBook category the book needs to be the first by the given photographer/artist.

The World In Black And White – Short Update

10331034515_afda78dca5_z
Hello hello, just wanted to give everybody another squirt of eye candy in between the few pieces I’m currently working on. What better way to do that than with some awesome possum B&W film photography ?
Film photography happens to be my third favorite hobby (which is really still saying something), and something I do on the side to get some subject matter or inspiration. Plus I mean, come on, who doesn’t love messing around with an old analog camera ? I especially love working in medium format, which you’ll learn very quickly if you follow me at all.
Hope this manages to satiate you guys during the content gap, enjoy.
Really like to see what I can do with multiple/double exposures. The effect can definitely turn out pretty great from time to time.
There’s something about the tangible nature of film photography that really excites me. The process of trying to get everything perfect in camera , chemically developing the film yourself, and then testing out different exposure times to get the perfect print. It’s definitely a labor of love, it’s an experience that becomes very intimate. You’re no longer just holding down the shutter button and taking 5-10 shots just to make sure you get what you want, and then post processing the hell out of it. Nope, you only have 24-36 exposures, and you better believe you want to make them count, and then you run home excitedly to see how they turned out instead of just glancing down at an LCD screen. It’s a great feeling, it certainly makes you think more about each shot in terms of composition, exposure, aperture.
Honestly, buy an old used film camera and go give it a shot, you might just  find a new passion. Worse case scenario, you’re out $20 and have some cool pictures.
I probably sound like a total geek after all that, but I don’t care, it’s a fantastic outlet and source of inspiration. I’ll always be a proud darkroom junkie : )
P.S. I have no problem with digital, and do use from time to time as a sort of litmus test for a shot, I just really love the process of film photography (if I didn’t make that inherently obvious in the previous paragraph).

Feature image is a long exposure of 3 seconds taken with a Pentax ZX-50 – Ilford HP5+ 400 ISO – All photos are original works 
by: 

ZAKK ZIEGLER